SecurityFocus:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/132/415186/30/30/threaded
Look for the threads regarding "IT Department Size"
Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote:
I'll find the threads and send them to you but on another listserve
there was just this discussion of how many IT people per network not
necessarily AD though.
The answer was .....
It depends.
It depended on your industry, regulation, needs, software.
Would management stop looking for industry standards when there isn't
anything like this please?
Bottom line... the more loosey goosey your desktops were, the more
manpower you needed for a network was the consensus.
David Aragon wrote:
We have just had a major change in Upper Management and I have been
given a
rather rare opportunity. As the EA, I have been asked if I need hire
more
people to better manage the AD environment. My immediate answer was
YES!
Then I got the bad news, my answer needs to have supporting
documentation of
"industry standards". I have never seen any documents relating to this
subject. So the question is, has anyone else? Can anyone point me
to any
documents relating to "industry standards" for workload and
management (e.g.
systems/tech, EA's/forest, etc.) of Active Directory (EA's, DA's, OU
Admins,
Techs, etc)? Anything published in the last couple of years would be
useful.
Thank you in advance.
David Aragon
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
