Yeah ....
Thanks a lot Gil !
This is all we need to hear and be reminded of.
For >YEARS< I have resisted putting a tag line at the end of my email, but I
have always had one that I was fond of.  Now I just might consider it.
I'm trademarking it so don't copy it.

"It's all just a house of cards!"

RH
_______________________________________



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 5:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer


By definition, the impact of a maintenance task is expected to be low.
But the behavior of a server isn't always predictable after you change
the software and/or configuration and reboot it. Sometimes just the
power or temperature fluctuation is enough to kick a marginal component
over the edge.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:16 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

If you want 100% insurance then yes transfering the FSMO roles prior to
the maintenance task could prevent an eventual seize if the particular
DC dies for some reason.

Maybe dependent on the maintenance task that is performed a decision
should be made if the FSMO roles should be transfered or not. So..
define maintenance task... what is the impact of the maintenance task?




jorge

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Tue 11/29/2005 6:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer


I'd move the FSMOs just in case "something" happens and the DC in fact
doesn't come back in 2 hours. How many times have you done PM on a
machine only to have it completely f***** up and have to restore? It
seems like about a 1-in-25 chance that something will go wrong.

-gil

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 9:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer


First, look at each role and see what it does...

Forest FSMOs
* Schema Master --> needed when updating the schema
* Domain Naming master --> needed when adding or removing domains within
the forest

Domain FSMOs
* PDC Emulator --> needed for legacy clients (NT4, W9x) when changing
passwords, used for time sync, is used for pwd checking when a user
enters an incorrect pwd at another DC, used by DFS roots to get DFS info
* RID Master --> needed to distribute RID pools to DCs that have
exhausted their current RID pool for 50% (=250 RIDs)
* Infrastructure --> needed to update references between domains in a
forest (does not do anything in a single domain forest)

If you look at this, there is no need to first transfer the FSMO roles
to another DC, just to carry out maintenance activities. It also depends
on the FSMO role. The most used ones in your case will be the RID and
the PDC FSMO. Only if you create more than 500 security principals
(users, groups and computers) during the moment that the DC with the RID
FSMO is down, you will experience a problem on the DC that is left. If
you still have legacy clients and they want to change the password that
will not be possible. And if those clients have the DSClient installed
that will not be an issue either.

In short: leave as is. it will be OK for those 2 hours

Cheers,
jorge

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amy Hunter
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 16:43
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer


Hi guys,

We have two DC's, one which holds the Forest FSMO roles, the other which
holds the domain FSMO roles.

I plan to take each server down at different times so that one of the
two servers can provide authentication etc while the other gets
maintained.

Initially, I was planning on moving the FSMO roles to the other DC while
maintainance work is carried out and transferring it back once it's
online again. I would then do the same for the other DC.

I was then told that you don't need to move the FSMO roles when you
perform maintenance on a DC holding the roles. Each server will be down
for about 2hrs.

Does anyone have advice for me? I would like to move the roles for peace
of mind knowing they are available, but if I don't need to do that, I
won! 't bother

Is there any recommended practice?

Amy

________________________________

To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new
Yahoo! Security Centre
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/security_centre/*http:/
/uk.security.yahoo.com/> .



This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be
copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are
not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and
any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/




List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to