But why reinvent the wheel individually when we should be asking Microsoft to either fix the wheel or build us a wheel in the first place? If it's a task that is repetitively done, has value, is used over and over again, I'd rather trust a gui wizard/console/button that's gone through beta testing by various testers that lays down an audit log file than a home grown script [no offense guys] that I'd have to go get interpreted.

Take the Security configuration wizard for example.. versus your own home grown version of the same. I'll take the SCW because I can see and confirm the resulting XML file, the program has been through beta testing process so in my brain I assign it a bit of lesser testing resources.

For my space, I trust the gui way more than I do a script from a web site that possibly wasn't built with SBS in mind.

But the gang that does Scripting drools over Monad. So get ready for Scripting on steriods.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=2ac59b30-5a44-4782-b0b7-79fe2efd1280&displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=8a3c71d1-18e5-49d7-952a-c55d694ecee3&displaylang=en

David Cliffe wrote:

Well, I just think that most of the people in the command line and/or
scripting "camp" like to encourage others to learn to use them simply
because they feel it's to your benefit.  I don't think they really like
to promote the "you're not a real admin..." sentiment.  Or at least I
hope not :-)  Right now in my org, I'm in the minority using the CLI.  I
just prefer working that way and don't knock my colleagues for their
methods, but rather show them other ways to get at the info they need.

CLI and scripting fosters your knowledge of what's happening in the
background, helps you learn the product and truly is a great way to
automate tasks!  (if not THE way)

For the longest time I've been meaning to learn VBscript, but haven't
devoted enough time to go for it yet.  From what I've seen so far, it
scares me  :-P  but I still intend to give it a shot.  I've been getting
by with Perl and CMD shell for now (I came from a KSH/*nix background).
Have you seen some of the sample command shell scripts Dean has put
together?  Or the stuff that Alain Lissoir can do with WMI?  Wow!

Anyway, this topic has drifted further now, but I'm going to resist the
urge to change the subject line.  The last time I did that, we had a
little side bit just on the fact that the subject line changed! :-D

-DaveC

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocky Habeeb
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

Susan,

"THANK YOU
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!"

There are a >LOT< of people on this list that do not believe that real
Admins use the GUI.  Some believe that you're not a real Admin if you
do.  I do.  I have to.  I can't allocate time to learn scripting right
now because I'm overworked as is.  I'll just leave it at that.

RH
______________________________________________


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer


<stupid question alert>

If the task is that trivial
If the benefit is so great
Why isn't it part of the AD snap ins as a one button task?

<sincerely, who needs scripting when you can ask for a gui/wizard or
button instead>

David Adner wrote:
I'm not debating the effort it takes to make the change.  I'm saying I
don't
see the point in devoting whatever amount of effort it takes for something that's going to provide benefit only, IMO, an extremely rare

case. And if that case happened, the corrective action is also a trivial process. And again, I'm not saying I don't see your point; I
just don't agree with it.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta Nathaniel V Contractor NASIC/SCNA
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

That process is trivial in itself.  It does not take much to transfer

the roles before you conduct maintenance on a server.  Why not do it?

It will save you cleaning up metadata after you seize a role of a failed operations master. Sounds like a stitch in nine saves time concept to me. I do not intend on taking every proactive measure either, but when it comes to the small and quickly implemented measures that could save plenty of time, I try to utilize all of them

available.

Is that agreeable?

Nathaniel Vincent Bahta

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

Any proper maintenance plan has a backout plan and a recovery plan, so I am preparing for the possibility of an unexpected problem. If I'm pulled into a dark room because something goes wrong then I should feel confident I'll leave that room with my hide mostly intact; it may be slightly singed, but I can live with that. If management isn't the reasonable type then that's a different issue.

If your philosophy is to take every proactive measure ahead of time possible, then that's fine. I just don't see the point with regards to FSMO roles when the recovery action is a relatively trivial process. This is obviously a matter of personal preference so I'm not trying to convince others to change. I just found the concept unusual so I thought I'd share.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 10:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

I would rather, as stated earlier, assess the risk and then act appropriately. The original poster never defined 'maintenance' in detail.

The original post did state that the box would be down for ~2 hours for maintenance. This is clearly more than a patch and a

reboot. We've

been over that scenario and concluded that it carries a lesser risk.

As joe said, if the maintenance all goes badly wrong, do

you want to

be pulled into a dark room and questioned as to why you did not prepare for that eventuality?


neil


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: 30 November 2005 15:29
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

Okay define maintenance please?

Patching?
Service Pack?
Applying QFEs?
Performance tuning?
What?

Is there a level of maintenance that would cause you to move FSMO's and not?

Like for example, if I'm patching, I've tested the patch, I'm reasonably expecting a favorable outcome otherwise I wouldn't be deploying, I have a backup.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I think we've missed the essence of the original post :)

The DCs are

not just being rebooted, they are being 'maintained' and

will be down

for ~ 2 hours. That means to me, that either a s/w or h/w

change is

going to occur which could go horribly wrong. Faced with this situation, I would definitely transfer the roles.
If the DC were merely being rebooted and nothing else is

scheduled to

occur, I would not transfer roles.
The above 2 scenarios are very different - if one were to

perform a

risk analysis the actions taken to mitigate those risks would be suitably different.
neil


---------------------------------------------------------------------
-

--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of

*David Adner

*Sent:* 29 November 2005 23:26
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

I would only agree if you told me your DC's regularly

fail to come

back after a reboot. And if you did tell me that I'd have to say you're doing something wrong.
I suppose I don't consider rebooting a DC to be quite the

dangerous

act as others do. To what degree is this taken? If it holds

a standard


Primary zone do you transfer that role, too? If it's the

PDCE of the

forest root domain and you transfer the role, do you also

reconfigure

the new PDCE to manually synchronize time from an authoritative source? I mean, if we're going to work under the

assumption that a

reboot is a regularly catastrophic causing event then

it's probably

time to switch OS's.
Is it possible something unexpectedly horrible can happen

as part of a


reboot? Sure. But it better be the exception. And with

regards to FSMO


roles, which, barring some specific technical requirement they be readily available, the temporary outage of them is typically a transparent event and shouldn't require added

administrative overhead

in transferring them back and forth. Accepting that a

catastrophic

event is an exception, then you follow your documented and tested activities to recover from that exception; ie: you seize

the roles,

restore from backup, etc.



--------------------------------------------------------------
----------

   *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On

Behalf Of *Rich

   Milburn
   *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2005 4:26 PM
   *To:* [email protected]
   *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

   Yeah but having "seize the FSMOs instead of moving

them" as your

   fallback plan is like making sure you have a current backup in
   case "yanking the power cord instead of Start > Shutdown >
   Restart" causes file system corruption J



//------------------------------------------------------------
----------
-///

   ///Rich Milburn///
   ///MCSE, Microsoft MVP - Directory Services///
   Sr Network Analyst, Field Platform Development
   Applebee's International, Inc.//
   //4551 W. 107th St//
   //Overland Park//, KS 66207//
   //913-967-2819//


//------------------------------------------------------------
----------
//

   ///"I love the smell of red herrings in the morning" -

anonymous//


---------------------------------------------------------------------
-

--

   *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2005 11:56 AM
   *To:* [email protected]
   *Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer

   If something went wrong you could still seize the FSMO

roles as an

   option rather than doing a transfer. Of course the

procedures for

   all of these for the 5 FSMOs should be documented just in case
   needed..

   Chuck

   /


--------------------------------------------------------------
----------

   *-------APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY

NOTICE-------*

   PRIVILEGED / CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this
   message or any attachments. This information is strictly
   confidential and may be subject to attorney-client

privilege. This

   message is intended only for the use of the named

addressee. If

   you are not the intended recipient of this message,

unauthorized

   forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or using such
   information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
   have received this in error, you should kindly notify

the sender

   by reply e-mail and immediately destroy this message.

Unauthorized

   interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal
   law. Applebee's International, Inc. reserves the right

to monitor

   and review the content of all messages sent to and from this
   e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail

address may

   be stored on the Applebee's International, Inc.

e-mail system./


---------------------------------------------------------------------
-

--

PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is

confidential

and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this email please notify the sender

immediately

and delete your copy from your system. You must not copy,

distribute

or take any further action in reliance on it. Email is

not a secure

method of communication and Nomura International plc

('NIplc') will

not, to the extent permitted by law, accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, or (b)

the presence


of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling code

in, this

message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this

email is

sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise

stated this

email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as, investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that

are solely

those of the author and do not necessarily represent

those of NIplc;

(3) is intended for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or offer to buy or sell

securities or

related financial instruments. NIplc does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England no.

1550505 VAT

No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St

Martin's-le-Grand, London,

EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is

confidential

and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this email please notify the sender

immediately

and delete your copy from your system.
You must not copy, distribute or take any further action in

reliance

on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent

permitted by law,

accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling code in, this message or any

attachment(s) to

it. If verification of this email is sought then please

request a hard

copy. Unless otherwise stated this email: (1) is not, and

should not

be treated or relied upon as, investment research; (2)

contains views

or opinions that are solely those of the author and do not

necessarily

represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended for informational

purposes

only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or offer to

buy or sell

securities or related financial instruments.  NIplc does

not provide

investment services to private customers.  Authorised and

regulated by

the Financial Services Authority.  Registered in England no.
1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand, London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the

Nomura group of

companies.

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except 
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to