|
You
should have two separate MX records @ IN MX 10 mail1.mydomain.com. @ IN MX 10 mail2.mydomain.com. Mail1 IN A 10.1.1.1 Mail2 IN A 10.2.2.2 RFC
2821 requires a mail server to choose MX records randomly when the records are
the same priority, but to try all if the initial one chosen doesn’t work
(until it finds one that does work or the pool is exhausted). Your
proposal below has the problem you describe. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Freddy HARTONO Hi All Was just trying to
understand something and am getting conflicting results.. If I set the following (or
2 mx of the same priority with 2 differnet a records) Mydomain.com
MX
10 mail.mydomain.com I understand that will
provide dns roundrobin but what happened if I shutdown 10.2.2.2, will I lose
(logically) 50% of my mail as I do not have another fallback MX?? My understanding is that it
does so as the sender mail server will cache the MX record and A record and
will only send to there, am I right or am I getting this wrong? If I'm shutting down
10.2.2.2, will the sender mail server retries to 10.1.1.1? (lets assume there's
no ttl reconfig to zero) Thanks lots Thank you and have a
splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono |
Title: [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing questions...
- [ActiveDir] [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing questions... Freddy HARTONO
- RE: [ActiveDir] [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing quest... Michael B. Smith
- RE: [ActiveDir] [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing quest... Freddy HARTONO
- RE: [ActiveDir] [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing quest... deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing quest... Freddy HARTONO
- RE: [ActiveDir] [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing quest... deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing quest... Derek Harris
- RE: [ActiveDir] [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing quest... Freddy HARTONO
