Perhaps hiring an experience MCSE contractor will help. Replications and
other issues with AD is almost always a start with DNS.
You are talking about redoing the who AD structure and loosing accounts
and passwords? How large is the company? How will you implement Windows
2003 differently than you did Windows 2000?
The languages on the workstations will not be an issue.
Jitendra Kalyankar wrote:
Here is scenario that is currently being played in my company. We have
W2K AD in place,
we are not using GPOs except one or two. Now suddenly they (read
managers) realized that
we need to implement GPO extensively. There are issues with current AD
infrastructure like
replication is not proper, DNS etc. And other thing is my company has
at least 12 different
language that we have to support on Windows XP OS.
Now there are two groups in company one is saying go for fixing the
existing infrastructure
and second is saying go for W2K3 since the W2K is almost non-existant.
My question to list
is what would you suggest in this situation. Any insights, inputs are
more than welcome. Also
I will keep posted about the decision we (read managers) make, we are
having a meeting with
Microsoft for this but just as heads up I need to understand obvious
pitfalls if any.
--
Sincerely,
Jitendra Kalyankar
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
