Susan, you may be the "annoying SBSer around here" - your comments are often the clear reminder of the limitations of some of our customers, and the things we can and need to do to make their IT world exist... Using SBS or not.
While there are a lot of best practice benfits and processes, how many of us work in places where EVERYTHING is best practice, and not just made to work because it had to be to support that app or this customer or whatever. Keep piping up, mate... themolk. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] > Sent: Monday, 19 December 2005 3:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Volume Shadow Services.. > > http://www.visualwin.com/VSS/Part2.html > > You can snap several times a day [in fact it's prob better that way] > > Just don't defrag the drive those snaps are on. > > Okay as the annoying SBSer around here I gotta pipe up and > say that nothing is that "bad" if it's monitored, taken care > of, and ensured that it's got a good backup. > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/columns/secmgmt/def > ault.mspx > > If they are less than 50 people... I'd put a SBS server in there... > Remote Web Workplace is a killer app and my daily 'in my face email' > keeps me aware of what's going on on that box. > > Amy Hunter wrote: > > > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > I have acquired an HP Proliant DL380. This has 6 hard disk slots > > available. I would like to use VSS as a tool to allow the people I > > help out to restore their data without me being around. (I do this > > free for experience). This will also be a DC ( I know, it's > bad, but > > they aren't big enough to warrant a separate box) > > > > I plan to configure the server as follows: > > > > Array A: 2 x 36.4GB for the OS, AD > > Array B: 3 x 72GB to store data > > Array C: 1 x 72GB VSS? > > > > When I have looked up on the web the suggestions for VSS, it's > > mentioned using separate volume for the shadow but > preferably separate > > disks for fault tolerance/performance. With my above configuration > > would this achieve the latter? Part of me feels this is slightly > > overkill. My other option was: > > > > Array A: 2 x 36.4GB for the OS, AD > > Array B: 4 x 72GB to store data (create a volume of 72GB) > > > > What I would like is for all the data on Array B to have a snapshot > > taken for at least over a week. 50% of the data is changed > throughout > > the week. As I am not here all the time, I want to make > sure I don't > > need to come in. Is 72GB an overkill? > > > > thanks for your time...Amy ;-) > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > Yahoo! Cars > > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/cars/*http://uk.cars. > > yahoo.com/> NEW - sell your car and browse thousands of new > and used > > cars online search now > > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/cars/*http://uk.cars. > > yahoo.com/> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
