How to create MAPI profiles without installing Outlook:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=306962
joe wrote:
There were ways around having outlook on the SQL Server and still having
mail capability for SQL. I don't recall the details as it was a long while
ago now and I avoid SQL Server but there was a high availability system I
had to put together that used SQL and after we worked out the base OS and
SQL configuration we set up the DBAs with their SQL Access (NO Admin Access
to the Server, no interactive Access to the server) and they said they
needed us to load outlook. We laughed for what seemed like 5 minutes at the
request. They figured something else out and got email notifications from
the server just fine.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Vander Kooi
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 2:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Why 64 for Exchange
Just about everyone using SQL Server prior to the release of 2005 was
wanting Outlook on their server to enable SQL Mail. Now why anyone would
have Exchange and SQL on the same box is beyond me.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA
aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Why 64 for Exchange
You Had Me At EHLO... : Exchange 12 and 64-bit:
http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/12/29/416613.aspx
*Co-existence with Outlook
*Outlook will co-exist great with E12 on the same server. This is because
32-bit Outlook runs in WOW
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/win64/
win64/running_32_bit_applications.asp>.
Many of you have been asking for this since the 2000 releases where this
became unsupported.
Who has been asking for this? Insane people? People who don't understand
that Outlook is a client app that doesn't belong on a server?
That it's another app that can get nailed with vulnerabilities?
BTW...speaking of vulns..there's an unpatched WMF vuln ....
Microsoft Switzerland Security Blog : Update on WMF 0day:
http://blogs.technet.com/ms_schweiz_security_blog/archive/2005/12/29/416
590.aspx
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
