|
Are we talking connection objects or site
links? I think From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de Still not clear... Explain what you mean with "is that if I manually create a CO from Site A to Site B, the KCC
then knows about Site C, Site D & Site E" Explain what you mean with "even though there is a physical connection (FR), and all ports are
open from Site A & Site B, the CO doesn’t get created automatically" And if a CO already exists (manually created) there would be no need to
create an auto generated one Jorge From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Harding, Devon Yes, I know that. What I’m
saying, is that if I manually create a CO from Site A to Site B, the KCC then
knows about Site C, Site D & Site E. But, even though there is a
physical connection (FR), and all ports are open from Site A & Site B, the
CO doesn’t get created automatically. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de Trying to understand what you are
saying... Not succeeding though... If you created a CO manually the
KCC will never touch that CO. Is that what you want to know? Jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on behalf of Harding, Devon What would cause a site link
connection from two sites not to automatically create? If I manually
create the connection, the KCC updates with the correct info about other sites,
but for some reason it’s not automatically creating the connection.
What ports are required for automatic creation? Windows
Systems Engineer Southern
Wine & Spirits - BSG 954-602-2469
__________________________________ |
- RE: [ActiveDir] Site link connection not created Marcus.Oh
