Yeah I believe I read that somewhere, probably ehlo. Of course that just helps the small misc MAPI issues with profiles, etc. It doesn't address the real reasons why you don't run Outlook on servers, like viruses, etc.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Prob not relevant here ...but -implement system policies in non AD Because Outlook will be running in 32-bit emulation, using it's own copy of mapi32.dll while Exchange will be running in 64-bit mode, using it's own copy of mapi64.dll (or whatever they may call it). That's my presumption, anyway. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:08 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Prob not relevant here ...but -implement system policies in non AD Not on a server sir. [at least not on Exchange 2003 anyway... next version it will be supported for whatever insane reason ...] Ken Cornetet wrote: >Outlook > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, >CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] >Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 10:21 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Prob not relevant here ...but -implement >system policies in non AD > >Don't forget SQL, Sharepoint, MSDE, ISA..... I'm sure I've forgotten >something around here... > >Laura E. Hunter wrote: > > > >>"...a single Domain Controller WITH EXCHANGE RUNNING ON IT", you mean? >> >>:-) >> >>On 1/11/06, joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>BLASPHEMY! >>> >>>Non-AD Environments! That's almost as bad as having a single Domain >>>Controller!!! >>> >>>:) >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan >>>Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] >>>Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:01 AM >>>To: [email protected] >>>Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Prob not relevant here ...but -implement >>>system policies in non AD >>> >>>How to implement system policies for Windows XP-based, Windows >>>2000-based, and Windows Server 2003-based client computers in >>>non-Active Directory >>>environments: >>>http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=910203 >>> >>>List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >>>List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >>>List archive: >>>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>----------------------- >>Laura E. Hunter >>Microsoft MVP - Windows Server Networking >>Author: _Active Directory Consultant's Field Guide_ >> >> >(http://tinyurl.com/7f8ll) > > >>List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >>List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >>List archive: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >> >> >> >> >> > >-- >Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? >http://www.threatcode.com > >List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
