Jeremy
There are no .dlls that it needs outside of whats in systerm32, but I think there are a bunch of .ldf files in \i386 that it uses.-gil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version QuestionsOk. Promise. Last adprep question: Does adprep need to be run from an i386 directory or can it be run on its own? Does it have dependant files within i386 or is it self-contained?
Thanks.
From: joe [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions
LOL. It isn't a decimal number though... It is a series of variable length decimal numbers separated by the period character... Sort of like an OID
1.2.840.113556.1.4.7000.102.7038
Versioning is a lost art I think though. I am big on xx.yy.zz.nnnn xx.=major, yy=minor, zz=really minor, nnnn=build.
To me... major rev changes for big changes, massive updates or rewrites or drammatic functional changes. minor is added features, bug fixes. really minor is output string changes or remarks in the code being changed, things that don't change the code flow and don't require any serious testing (I rarely update this one). And build of course is how many times the bin has been compiled.
G:\>filever f:\dev\cpp\adfind\adfind.exe
--a-- W32i APP ENU 1.29.0.785 shp 950,784 12-22-2005 adfind.exe
The current release version of adfind for instance has been compiled 785 times. Well actually that is incorrect, it has compiled 785 times since V01.08.00. There was a little bug in the routine I had been using to increment the counter and it was resetting on every new minor version rev. If I follow the average I am probably off by 250-300 compile build numbers but I expect it is less than that because as the complexity grew in versions >15 the number of compiles between releases went up due to testing and bug hunting.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version QuestionsIt's a common source of confusion.
Ask a user if version 1.4.4 is newer or older than 1.4.3.4 :)
Some say "34>4 therefore the latter is newer" some say "4>3 therefore the former is newer"
neil
PS The purist in me would say that without a leading 0, the 196 below looks like 1 thousand 9 hundred and 60 and 1960>1830. it's all about justification, when dealing with the decimal notation :)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: 18 January 2006 15:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version QuestionsAh don't worry about it, I figured you were just disconnected there when I saw the first question at all. That is why I counted it out. :)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version QuestionsOh (blush)
Don't mind me. I'm just over here re-learning that whole tens, hundreds, thousands, etc thing.
Ugh! (eyes roll skyward, head shakes)
;-)
Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
From: joe [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions
one thousand eight hundred and thirty is greater than one hundred ninety six. The SP1 version is the most recent and highest version of adprep.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
...
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
...
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
...
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 7:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questionsyes
From: joe [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions
Are you asking if 1830 < 196 ?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version QuestionsHi-
I am preparing to upgrade a W2k domain to W2k3. I want to use the latest version of ADPrep. I have found the following info and am confused:
For ADPrep on the following -
From Windows Server 2003 CD: 5.2.3790.0 July 22, 2004, 9:07:08 AM
from WindowsServer2003-KB889101-SP1-x86-ENU.exe: 5.2.3790.1830 November 07, 2005, 5:48:59 PM
listed in MSKB / Hotfix 324392 5.2.3790.196 July 23, 2004, 9:04
Am I reading that correctly: the one from SP1 is a lower version and later date than the one in the hotfix? Which one is the "latest"?
Thanks.
-- nme
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/2006PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc
does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/233 - Release Date: 1/18/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/235 - Release Date: 1/19/2006
