|
I have to agree. It seems that once you
have finally dorked around for what seems forever and have it working,
something (whether it be a samba vulnerability or some other *nix change;
especially in Solaris) breaks it and you have to dork around again. Vintela
honestly took me less than 10 minutes to get it working on the first Solaris
machine (including reading the instructions) and probably a minute for every
machine thereafter. I have used SFU and At least get a price quote and compare it
to 40 hours x 2 x your hourly rate, before going down the path of trying it
yourself. Could take less than 80 hours or more, but I would say a good
baseline for Solaris. The times 2 comes from the fact that for every hour you
are working on it, you take an hour away from something else that needs done. On a side note, I did learn a lot when
messing around with trying it myself. I apologize for my scattered way of
thinking and composing a message. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe I would just say Centrify and Vintela
unless you want to spend a good amount of time dorking around with it. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Al Mulnick Not sure what you mean by redundant fsmo but... As for integration: opensource: samba was supposed to come out with a v4 of their product
that looked promising. Centrify and Vintella would be more of what I'd look for however.
Much smoother integration. PAM modules could be used if you really wanted to, although it wouldn't
be my first choice. NFS? That doesn't solve your issue of single credentials. Al On 1/30/06, Simon
Bembridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: I
am in the process of establishing a Single forest/domain, Best Regards, Simon |
- RE: [ActiveDir] UNIX intergation into W2K3 Domain Douglas M. Long
