Just a friendly reminder to those supporting SBS servers... SBS servers do not get the benefit of the DFS upgrades in R2. Member servers can get the R2 bits but not the SBS/DC itself. (yeah yeah I know... we shouldn't be using as a file server in the first place...but ...hey)

Grillenmeier, Guido wrote:

and pls. make use of redirecting your documents folder (and many other
things as well, such as Desktop) to a server share.

DFS is ok to use for many profile scenarios - but it won't be of much
help if the profiles get too large (still needs to be loaded by the
client, even if the source is now closer by). DFS-Replication has been
improved a lot in R2, but I'd still recommend to reduce what you keep in
your profile.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Navroz Shariff
Sent: Freitag, 3. Februar 2006 22:16
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles

I would highly discourage against using cached mode for roaming
profiles. Just imagine the network resources they would be hogging up
when they log onto a different computer and not to mention HDD space. We
definitely have disable cached mode for roaming profiles. -Nav
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 3:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles

I agree... but what about OST files - Outlook cached mode.  Is anyone
excluding the OST from the roaming profile?  If so, a new OST will need
to be downloaded at each computer the user logs into.  Most are
100-300MB.  Which is the lesser evil. :)

...D

On 2/3/06, Thommes, Michael M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As just another piece of this, users sometimes just throw stuff on their "desktop" since they don't know any better or because that might

be the first location that shows up during a save operation. The desktop is obviously included as part of the profile, leading to
bloated sizes.

Mike Thommes








-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles



I too am a fan of local profile, but I do not think that directly addresses Frank's issues...



A couple of jobs ago at a school we used roaming profiles exclusively - made sense in our scenario. There was still at least 3-4 staff on a bad day that needed their profile reconfig-ed (all students used a
mandatory profile).
Bottom line - use GPO's to limit the size of the user "dumping" grounds, and/or redirect them. It's amazing how your profile shrink dramatically when you don't allow users to store their files as a part

of their profile, you don't copy their IE cache, and redirect a couple
of other folders.

I feel for you Frank, as with users with profiles in excess of, say, 20 MB - with your links speeds, I am amazed that you do not experience

more problems (but then I am sure it is only the ones that moves sites

that cause the issues... give them a laptop and make them have local profiles!). ;)



My $0.02 inc GST...



themolk.





________________________________


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Krenceski, William
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2006 10:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles

I personally avoid roaming and mandatory roaming like the plague. One thing you can do is create a DFS Root for the profiles of the users that move around replicate to all of the sites that they visit. I would not recommend doing it for everyone else. I would actually stop using roaming for everyone else that does not roam. there are many alternatives to roaming using Group Policies because no matter how you

look at it you are slowing down the user logon and the network
especially with that many users.

JMTC



Bill


________________________________


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Abagnale
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 4:51 AM
To: Active
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles


Hi all,


I have a question regarding Roaming Profiles. Our environment currently have 3500 users which are all roaming profile enabled. Their

profiles are stored on the local site server. We have approx 56 sites which are all linked by 256-1mb lines.


I like the concept of roaming profiles, however some of our users have

profiles ranging from 5mb - 200mb, some even with 1GB profiles.


Because alot of our users log on to different computers at different sites, we are finding issues with corrupted profiles and logon speeds.

On a few occasions, where a user has been added to a group, the permissions assign to this group are not shown when the users is logged back on. Deleting the profile and recreating fixes this issue but it's quite a time consuming effort.


How does everyone deal with roaming profiles if used? sometimes there are instances where users just want to logon to the PC without their roaming profile so they can remote desktop to their PC. In this situation they have to take their profile across which can take forever depending on the size of profile and link.


Any creative ideas? how about using DFS to store the profiles?


Thanks


Frank



________________________________


Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this

message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any release, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify the author immediately by replying to this message and deleting the original message. Thank you.


--
CPDE - Certified Petroleum Distribution Engineer CCBC - Certified
Canadian Beer Consumer
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to