What kind of pills you looking for Guido? Little Ectasy or some Oxycontin? You don't want those, they severely impact your ability to think and to realize that impact. I am sure they are readily available in Vegas though.
:o) -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier, Guido Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 3:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DR strategy question I'm not so hot on wheat beer - how about a nice pils :-) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 19:33 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DR strategy question Thanks, I'll buy you an Erdinger in Vegas. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier, Guido Sent: 10 February 2006 18:25 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DR strategy question > What would the impact be on AD if they plugged the OS and Application > disks back in after 3 months or after AD tomestoning? well, I'd say AD won't have too much of an issue with it at all - however, they'd have to reset the Exchange Server's machine-pwd or rejoin it to the domain since it will likely not be able to create a secure channel. Not sure how the Exchange server itself will react to this time-warp (it would likely cough up a bit)... but it doesn't sound like a scenario that would hurt your AD. Certainly important not to use this approach (using a mirror-disk) for AD DC themselves (could be a potential solution if you could really guarantee that you'd pull the disks from all DCs in the forest at the same time - highly unlikely and certainly not recommended). But I'd certainly also question this approach from a long-term cost-perspective... /Guido -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 13:02 To: ActiveDir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: DR strategy question Where I am working at the moment part of their DR strategy consists of breaking a mirrored pair and keeping it in a fire safe in the event of server failures, I have managed to get them to drop this idea for DC's but they still insist on doing it for other servers. Application servers I don't care about but I do care about the Exchange server , they are only pulling the mirror on the OS and the Application and not on logfiles etc, as these are on raid 5. What would the impact be on AD if they plugged the OS and Application disks back in after 3 months or after AD tomestoning? What is the impact on the other files on the other disks. The org is E2K3 and W2K3 too. It smells of deep deep sh.... to me but, I want quantification. Mark List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
