Yeah, I realized that after I sent it. I was thinking SQL x86 vs x64. :) :m:dsm:cci:mvp marcusoh.blogspot.com
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Onyszko Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs / x64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Isn't there a different CAL for Win2k3 x64? > AFAIK it is the same CAL: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/howtobuy/licensing/calovervie w.mspx <quote> With Windows Server 2003, CALs are no longer triggered based on the use of certain services but are instead based on access to and/or use of the server software. This holds true for all editions of Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2003 R2, except Web Edition. Windows CALs are not required for Web Edition. </quote> All editions includes x64. -- Tomasz Onyszko http://www.w2k.pl/blog/ - (PL) http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/ - (EN) List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
