|
You could add the built-in security
principal “NT AUTHORITY\INTERACTIVE” as local administrator instead
of the global group. This may help stop users gaining access to each others C$
shares but they could still log onto another users workstation and be an
administrator. You said management are ”concerned”
and maybe that would be a good enough basis to revoke admin rights from users. William From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ Through the "Restricted Groups"
GPO provided out of the box. It replaces membership of groups on local
desktops and/or servers with selected users/groups so that no one can modify
the local adminsitrators group without it changing back to our standard.
See http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/Using-Restricted-Groups.html From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phillip Partipilo Curious, how do you do that via GPO?
a custom ADM? Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, (561) 747-6107 From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ Ahh yes, we do have all users in one
global group, and that global group is auto-added to every local administrators
group on each PC through GPO. I guess that explains that. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Vander Kooi Being a local admin on a PC does not give
them the ability to see another machine's C$ share. This would occur if
you added a group (local admins) to the administrators group on all PCs
and then added users to that group instead of doing it on a user by user basis.
That said, I would look for any and all ways of NOT giving users local admin
rights on their computers, although I know in some instances, usually due to
poor coding, it can't be avoided. Tim From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ Well someone just realized that since all our users are
local admins on their PCs that they can map to another users C$ share and see
all their data. They asked mgmt if they knew about that, and now of
course, they're concerned about it. It's been this way for years, but I
digress. SO, what is the general conscensus on giving users full
ability to install/remove software at will, but not allowing them to map to
other PCs c$ drives? Make everyone Power Users instead? Is there
anything that they might lose from going from local admins to power users on
their PCs besides this c$ mapping functionality?
|
