|
You might try establishing a “Preferred Bridgehead” server at the hub and spoke sites (Probably 2 is good), that should allow you to control who is chosen for replication CO’s. Also you might also consider DNS record weights if you would like to lower the priority of the DC’s running DDNS for other things like authentication.
Todd Myrick
From: Olivarez, Sergio
J Mr ANOSC/FCBS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You might want to look into using Active Directory Load Balancing tool (adlb.exe); I’ve never used the tool but it might help you control replication and the connection objects. Personally, I would trust the KCC and let it do its jobJ
Thanks... ... ... ... Sergio J. Olivarez - Contractor GD-NS From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russ,
Perhaps you should consider disabling the KCC within one or more sites, or forest-wide if this is a big issue.
Otherwise, I'd treat all DCs as equals and let the KCC 'do its thing' :)
neil From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ All our remote sites automatically pick the same DC at DHQ, but this site picked a DC that is our primary DNS server at DHQ for some reason. We've never had that DC be selected by the KCC before, and I'm not sure why it picked that one instead.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de Hi Russ,
The KCC runs 5 mins after the DC boots and after that each 15 min..
The KCC creates CO as it sees fit (and that depends on the site and replication topology, partitions to replicate and replicas hosting partitions). If you remove the CO manually, it will recreate them during the next KCC cycle. The creation of auto COs also depends on what manual COs have been created. Manual created COs will never be touched by the KCC
So, why do you think it is wrong or what do you mean with "If you promote a new domain controller and it doesn't automatically generate the right replication links"
jorge From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Rimmerman, Russ If you promote a new domain controller and it doesn't automatically generate the right replication links, is it safe or recommended to delete the link it generated and manually create the replication link? Or if you delete it will it try to automatically generate it again?
PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law, accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as, investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand, London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies. |
RE: [ActiveDir] Automatically generated replication links
Myrick, Todd \(NIH/CC/DNA\) [E] Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:32:07 -0800
- RE: [ActiveDir] Automatically generated re... Myrick, Todd \(NIH/CC/DNA\) [E]
- RE: [ActiveDir] Automatically generat... Rimmerman, Russ
