although nothing official, we've done testing HP internally and were quite comfortable using a single well-sized 64-bit DC (well-sized meaning our whole DIT cached in memory) serving one of our sites with approx. 4 Exchange Mbx. servers (I believe all dual-proc) with a total of 20.000 mailboxes.  It worked like a charm.
 
/Guido


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Sonntag, 2. April 2006 09:52
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Performance for 64-bit Versions of Windows Server 2003

And silence swept the community as Microsoft folks dived under desks searching for dropped pens....
 
 
I second this request pleasethankyouverymuch.
 
 
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Olson
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 12:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Performance for 64-bit Versions of Windows Server 2003

Thanks.   Looks like a really great white paper.   Anything in the works to provide updated DC sizing for exchange ?

Thanks again.

Jeremy

On 3/30/06, Steve Linehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since it has been asked many times on the alias when will a paper be released detailing the scenarios when deploying 64-bit servers for Active Directory makes since and providing detailed analysis and numbers,  I thought everyone would be happy to know that the Active Directory Program Management and Development teams have released the following White Paper: "Active Directory Performance for 64-bit Versions of Windows Server 2003"  http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=52e7c3bd-570a-475c-96e0-316dc821e3e7&DisplayLang=en.
 
Thanks,
 
-Steve


Reply via email to