Mike- Did you ever get any resolution on this or more info?
Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion? > > Ask him/her what the article number is if this is a known issue. If > he/she says there isn't one then say it sure isn't known very well > then. > > > -- > O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - > http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, > Michael M. > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion? > > Our MS TAM has indicated this is a known bug! I will keep the group > posted as I learn more details. > > Mike Thommes > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, > Michael M. > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:52 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion? > > As an update to this thread, we transferred the Schema Master role back > to other DC that has the SFU tools installed originally thinking this > might get the R2 schema update to work. Wrong! It fails with the same > error. I can only imagine we do not have that unique an environment in > our testbed and expect others to have the same experience. Luckily, we > never put SFU 3.5 on our production systems. > > We are going to open up a trouble ticket with Microsoft regarding this > issue. I would like to hear of others' experiences (success or > failure) when trying to install R2 in an environment where SFU 3.5 had > been installed. Thanks! > > Mike Thommes > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, > Michael M. > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:07 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion? > > Hi Guido, > Thanks for the response! This server is Windows 2003/SP1 with all > but the current month's patches. It is the current FSMO role holder. > I did some checking this morning and find the SFU 3.5 tools on another > DC that could have been the FSMO role holder at the time the SFU schema > changes were made. I don't see why that would make any difference, do > you? > > -mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier, > Guido > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion? > > Mike - I see you're upgrading from Win2000 AD. Are your sure that > you've previously installed SFU 3.5 or was it maybe SFU 2.0 ? > > The reason I'm asking is that there's a known schema incompatibility > with SFU 2.0: > check out http://support.microsoft.com/?id=293783 "Cannot Upgrade > Windows 2000 Server to Windows Server 2003 with Windows Services for > UNIX 2.0 Installed" > > CAUSE > The upgrade may not work because the attributeSchema 'uid' that is used > by Windows 2000 Server for the NIS schema is not compatible with the > one that is used by Windows Server 2003. > > As such your error is likely independent from the changes in the R2 > schema - it's actually an incompatibility in the Win2003 base schema > (not that this really matters for you; I just want to clarify that the > error should be unrelated to R2). As such it's different from Aric's > case, who was performing an upgrade from a Win2003 schema to Win2003 > R2... > > > /Guido > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, > Michael M. > Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 02:53 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion? > > Hi Aric, > No, there were a lot more errors - all seem to be related to SFU > attributes. I only copied a small portion to my posting to save > bandwidth. > Painful = time = headaches 8-( I was expecting this upgrade to be a > "walk in the park". > > Mike Thommes > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion? > > Are these the only two errors you received? > > I encountered similar errors during beta testing when I implemented R2 > in an existing forest - but a lot more than just 2. :) I created a > secondary forest and validated that it did not recur. Note that I also > had SFU installed in the original forest and the new secondary forest. > > I was able to clean up the schema in the existing forest exhibiting the > errors but it was a fairly painful process of what seemed to be a goose > chase. The tasks included disabling objects attributes in the schema > and renaming them amongst other things. > > Fortunately I have not heard of this happening in production...yet. > > So can these errors be ignored? If I remember correctly ADPrep is > actually failing and therefore NO you cannot ignore these errors since > ADPREP will nto occur until they are resolved. > > Regards, > > Aric > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, > Michael M. > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion? > > Hi, > We did a adprep /forestprep from the W2K3/SP1 R2 Disk 2 CD today on > our testbed FSMO DC. It gave the following errors (only a portion > shown > below) because, I am guessing, that we had already installed SFU 3.5 on > this forest some time ago. Should I assume these errors can be > ignored? > Has anybody else experienced this? Thanks as always! > > Mike Thommes > > ==================================================================== > > "attributeId" attribute value for objects defined in Windows 2000 > schema and ext ended schema do not match. > > > A previous schema extension has defined the attribute value as > "1.2.840.113556.1 > .4.7000.187.70" for object > "CN=uidNumber,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=anl,DC=go > v" differently than the schema extension needed for Windows 2003 server > . > [Status/Consequence] > Adprep cannot extend your existing schema [User Action] Contact the > vendor of the application that previously extended the schema to res > olve the inconsistency. Then run adprep again. > > > > > ======================================================================= > = > ===== > "attributeId" attribute value for objects defined in Windows 2000 > schema and ext ended schema do not match. > > > A previous schema extension has defined the attribute value as > "1.2.840.113556.1 > .4.7000.187.71" for object > "CN=gidNumber,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=anl,DC=go > v" differently than the schema extension needed for Windows 2003 server > . > [Status/Consequence] > Adprep cannot extend your existing schema [User Action] Contact the > vendor of the application that previously extended the schema to res > olve the inconsistency. Then run adprep again. > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.mail- > archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.mail- > archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
