Yeah there's a reg hack in GP. You set some timeout to 0 to force it to
TCP. UDP drives the firewalls crazy

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
c - 312.731.3132
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:54 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Forcing Kerberos to use TCP instead of UDP
> 
> Been a bit since I played with this but I seem to recall it is the
> CLIENT that gets the reg change.
> 
> RE: #3, did you troubleshoot where the packets were being dropped at?
> Most likely there was a misconfigured or failing network device
> somewhere along the line.
> 
>   joe
> 
> --
> O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivarez,
> Sergio J Mr CTNOSC/GD-NS
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 5:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Forcing Kerberos to use TCP instead of UDP
> 
> 
> 1)In my experience, yes all dc's.
> 2)None that I can think of.  Might want to do this to clients that are
> having to authenticate over VPN conn.
> 3)In my case, when the Kerberos was allowed over UDP it caused many
> issues.
> When it was forced over TCP all problems were resolved.
> 4)Yes, IPSEC over WAN connections.
> 5)Haven't heard any complains.
> 
> Read the following article by Joe, it makes some good points about it
-
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg40624.html
> 
> 
> -Sergio
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 1:44 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Forcing Kerberos to use TCP instead of UDP
> 
> On 4/26/06, Olivarez, Sergio J Mr CTNOSC/GD-NS
> wrote:
> > Many times!   What is your concern?
> 
> 1) Does this change need to be made to all DC's?
> 2) What changes need to be made to clients and/or GPO's?
> 3) Will this have a short (or long) term negative impact to
operations?
> 4) Has this been a solution for you with broken AD trusts between site
> to site VPN connections?
> 5) Is there any affect on over network traffic?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> ...D
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-
> archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-
> archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-
> archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to