When you installed Exchange 2003 you extended the schema and fixed the problem then. So no, you don't need the InetOrgPerson fix now. Running the Exchange 2003 schema extension (and allowing it to fully replicate out) before the 2003 AD schema extension is a common recommendation to avoid having to worry about this specific issue.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:57 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ActiveDir] InetOrgPersonFix.... Do I need it? > > Quick question that I can't find a simple, definitive answer > to with a Google search... > > I've got a AD 2000 Forest (2000 FFL). We're preparing to > upgrade our first DC to Server 2003 (planning to use the > ADPrep off the R2 CD). > I've already verified the AD, FRS, and other items are > running well so I'm just about ready to roll... > > I've already got Exchange 2003 running on the forest/domain. > Do I need to run the InetOrgPersonFix.ldf in this environment > or were the fixes > incorporated into the Exchange 2003 forestprep/domainprep? > > Everything I've read does specify an Exchange 2000 > environment (including Joe & Robbie's 3rd edition book, > p363). However, I thought it better to ask than to be sorry > later that I didn't run it. > > Joe Pochedley > Software suppliers are trying to make their software packages > more user-friendly... Their best approach, so far, has been > to take all the > old brochures, and stamp the words, 'user-friendly' on the cover." - > Bill Gates. > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
