If you have 4gig of RAM then you should get minimal paging. (I know this is a 
great generalization)
 
1) Log file access is sequential, database is random
2) Keeping Log files write queue down is key to performance
3) log files are write only
4) raid-5 tends to have poor write performance (again greate generalization).
 
So I would try and get another drive in the box so I could have a mirrored pair 
for OS & LOGS, and a mirrored pair for Databases. . Putting these on seperate 
drives will do far more for performance than changing the page file. RAID-5 is 
a real bad performer on write. These days I woudl avoid as far as possible...
 
I am sure other folks may disagree... 

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dan DeStefano 
        Sent: Thu 04/05/2006 21:36 
        To: [email protected] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Optimize Exchange Pagefile
        
        

        Yes, far less than 100, on this box it is under 20.

        You do not think it is necessary to mess with the page file, even if 
only to make it static?

         

         

        Dan

         

         

         

        
  _____  


        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Wade
        Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:06 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Optimize Exchange Pagefile

         

        There is no point in messing about with memory config if you only have 
a three drive RAID 5 array. Disk config is critical. How many users do you want 
to put on this box. less than 100?

         

         

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dan DeStefano 
        Sent: Thu 04/05/2006 20:16 
        To: [email protected] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: [ActiveDir] Optimize Exchange Pagefile

                I was wondering if anyone can point me to any MS document that 
discusses optimizing the page file on an Exchange box. I found 
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/815372, but this article does not discuss the 
page file. I am running SBS 2003 on a 3 GHZ Xeon with 4GB physical memory and a 
3-disk RAID5 array with 2 logical drives. I plan on installing the Exchange 
binaries on the first logical drive (which will also contain the system and 
boot partitions) and the Exchange databases, logs, queues, etc on the second 
logical drive.

                 

                The way I normally set the pagefile on my systems is to set it 
to be static and 1.5x physical RAM. I also create a pagefile on each disk and 
let Windows choose the best one (which will be the second logical drive). I do 
not want to disable the pagefile on C: because, from what I understand, this 
will disable crash dumps, which I do not want. However, I set the crash dump to 
kernel only, not the entire pagefile. That being said, would it be appropriate 
to set the pagefile on C: to something small like 256MB since the OS will be 
using the one on the second drive anyway?

                 

                Also, other than not using the /3GB switch, are there any other 
differences between the memory/pagefile settings on a regular Exchange box 
running WS2k3 and the SBS2k3 version?

                 

                I would appreciate any guidance.

                 

                 

                Dan DeStefano

                Info-lution Corporation

                www.info-lution.com

                MCSE - 2073750

                 

        **********************************************************************

        This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

        intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they

        are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to 
disclose this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of Information 
Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in 
the Act. 

        If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport e-Services 
via [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then permanently remove it from your system. 

        Thank you.

        http://www.stockport.gov.uk

        **********************************************************************

Dan DeStefano
Info-lution Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.info-lution.com <http://www.info-lution.com/> 
Office: 727 546-9143
FAX: 727 541-5888

If you have received this message in error please notify the sender, disregard 
any content  and remove it from your possession.

 

Dan DeStefano
Info-lution Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.info-lution.com <http://www.info-lution.com/> 
Office: 727 546-9143
FAX: 727 541-5888

If you have received this message in error please notify the sender, disregard 
any content  and remove it from your possession.

 

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to