|
Hi, Jorge, We’re talking in the context of an
AD replication site. If it were picking writeable anywhere, then yeah, that
would not be good for network utilization unless you’re a provider and
charge by the bit. The point is that in a site, the writeable copy of a
partition is potentially higher fidelity than any of the read-only copies. The
KCC must take the write-ability of a partition into account when it’s
working out the topology since it at least has to make sure the writeable
copies all replicate amongst themselves. Wook From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de To my knowledge a GC
searches for a replication partner it can use to source the partitions from and
it does not care if it uses the writable versions or read-only version.
Both have the data needed. On the other side, if it did use only writable NCs,
that would mean replication could place over all kinds of WAN links while a
partner GC will all the data was standing next it. Or have I missed something? jorge Met vriendelijke
groeten / Kind regards, Ing. Jorge de Almeida
Pinto Senior Infrastructure
Consultant MVP Windows
Server - Directory Services LogicaCMG
Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC ( Tel : +31-(0)40-29.57.777 ( * E-mail : <see
sender address> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of joe Ah sorry,
you mean the initial population, I dropped that piece... That |
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] GC Promotion
- RE: [ActiveDir] GC Promotion joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] GC Promotion Lee, Wook
- RE: [ActiveDir] GC Promotion Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
- RE: [ActiveDir] GC Promotion Lee, Wook
