Let me put that into perspective (and from reading the post again I
thought it came across), the blog entry refers to networks with a large
client load. I don't mean do NOT have DNS on your server it recommends
(Option 2) releasing some of the load with the two registry settings,
i.e. *LdapSrvPriority *and *LdapSrvWeight*.which is explained in the
entry :)
These settings I have only ever used on large networks when I have
noticed a large amount of DNS traffic being routed to the PDC DNS
Service. :)
Does that explain the post if not just let me know what more information
you need and I will explain it :)
Carlos Magalhaes
ASB wrote:
Which blog entry...
-ASB
On 5/17/06, *Krenceski, William* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I was reading Carlos's blog about not running DNS on the PDC
emulator. It all makes perfect sense to not have DNS running on
it. In my relatively small setup we have @60 servers, 560pc's, on
8 networks (some remote some vlans). I have 2 DC's at my main site
with one at each remote site. All DC's are GC and DNS. I always
thought that in order for DNS to work as AD integrated you're DNS
servers had to be DC's. If that is NOT true my face is red for
believing so for so long.
**
**
*William Krenceski*
*Network Administrator*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
