William figured it was best to leave it alone without registry tweaks
(assuming anyone can read this email, I'm hoping I read that right -
William, you likely don't have to worry about it.)  Carlos was aiming
that concept at people that have overloaded PDCe's and might need to
off-load some services. You're not likely one of those folks and
should consider leaving it as is.

I recently had an off-line conversation about Active Directory
integrated DNS and have been considering filing a bug/dcr or sets of
both.  In large environments, active directory DNS can become an
issue, especially over time.  Logging is something that's next to
impossible to get from it.  The trade-off of course is the stellar
replication model that integrated uses. Can be tough to decide which
is better: the better replication and living with the ACL's/lack of
logging etc.

Some areas it fits into well.  I'm a fan, but there are trade-offs.



On 5/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Interesting stuff joe ......

Many of us have used ADI zones for many (well 7+) years now with little or
no issue, in various orgs sizes and types.

I'd like to hear more about this issue, since IMO, ADI zones offer huge
advantages to a typical org over BIND text files. [I won't expand upon these
advantages here, since they are well documented.]

Have you encountered an isolated issue or a true show stopper which we
should all sit up and take note of?? :)

With regard to running DNS on a DC - if an existing DNS implementation
exists that can support AD, then use it. Otherwise, I see DNS as a VERY
minor overhead, compared with the other services that a DC provides and
would not hesitate to install DNS on a (or indeed every) DC.

my 2 penneth.

Thanks,
neil
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joe
Sent: 17 May 2006 14:55

To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT


To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT


If your DNS is integrated, find a big piece of wood to knock on... Or keep
it around to bang your head on later.

I'll run DNS on DCs if I have to. I will run it integrated if threatened
badly enough.

I recently ran into a nasty DNS problem in an integrated DNS where DNS would
start but wouldn't actually respond to anything. It appears to be related to
a possible AD Replication bug I found though. I have to research a little
more and see if it was one off or I can duplicate at will. Once I removed
the items causing the issue replication worked again and DNS came back to
life.

But enough about DNS, I don't speak about services that start with D. You
have to draw the line somewhere. DFS, DNS, DHCP, Damn SQL Server... You get
the drift. ;)



--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm


________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Craig Cerino
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:05 AM

To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT


To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT




At the very least it (DNS) should be on ONE of the DCs.



I personally do not have an issue with DNS running on all of my DCs - --
which it is.  I have heard/read all the arguments for and against.  I still
have no issue - - (Searching for wood to knock) I've not had an
issue/conflict once.



________________________________


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Krenceski, William
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:38 AM

To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT


To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT






I was reading Carlos's blog about not running DNS on the PDC emulator. It
all makes perfect sense to not have DNS running on it. In my relatively
small setup we have @60 servers, 560pc's, on 8 networks (some remote some
vlans). I have 2 DC's at my main site with one at each remote site. All DC's
are GC and DNS. I always thought that in order for DNS to work as AD
integrated you're DNS servers had to be DC's. If that is NOT true my face is
red for believing so for so long.










William Krenceski

Network Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be
legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of
the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any release,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify
the author immediately by replying to this message and deleting the original
message. Thank you.
PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc
does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.

Reply via email to