Sorry, should have been a smiley in there somewhere around the first line.
;o)
 


--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange Cache Mode -Help

As much as it pains me, I have to agree with Deji, we do handle a
considerable number of Exchange questions here. Most tend towards server
side operation over outlook but all should get the OT badge because they
aren't strictly AD unless the question is Exchange but directly related to
AD functionality right off.

Exchange is actually a good app to talk about when discussing AD perf just
because of how much it beats on it. 

  joe


--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange Cache Mode -Help

We've always "tried" to answer Exchange questions here. YMMV, but most
Exchange admins I know are also buried deep in AD world. Most AD admins I
know also work daily on Exchange. With the close integration between Exc and
AD, I feel that asking Exc-related question here is to be expected.
 
I agree that prefixing the subject with "OT" will make some filters happy,
but the inference that this list is Exchange-intolerant is incorrect.
 

Sincerely, 
   _____                                
  (, /  |  /)               /)     /)   
    /---| (/_  ______   ___// _   //  _ 
 ) /    |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/                             /)      
                               (/       
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com <http://www.readymaids.com>  - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com <http://www.akomolafe.com> Do you now realize that Today
is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Wed 5/17/2006 1:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange Cache Mode -Help


Did I not get the memo about this list changing to the Exchange list?
 
 
Hmmm... Maybe I need to re-evaluate my filters.

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Milton Sancho
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange Cache Mode -Help



I have a Win 2003 -installed exchenge server 2003
Scenario:

 I have an user who has configure her exchange mailbox properly; the user is
using a cache mode file(.ost), so far good. Yesterday I configured her
laptop because she is leaving the country, I configured (Exchange access
over HTTP) plus option Cache Mode.  But 2 hours later the user call me
telling me she lose all the e-mails of the day !!!!!! . I checked and she
was right . The e-mails were not there ?????????? However I found all the
e-mails in the server (Message Tracking Center) 

Two days ago an IT guy remove the mailbox from other user (Computer
maintenance) then he reconfigured the mailbox and set to use a new .ost file
the last one was 480MB, but now ... the user call me telling me can not find
a lot e-mails that he received. ?????????? ... The same all the e-mails are
in the server but not in the client???? 

I am not sure what is going on ?? Please comments to solve this situation.

Thank You ...

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to