Its the one thing that seems to give us performance issues. Last time I 
investigated things running slow, client was quiet (low CPU short disk queue, 
minimal paging) , network was quiet yet response was slow. Conclusion was that 
server was some how bottle neck. I must admit I didn't do much work on 
investigation. I think they should use appropriate tool such as msde (only a 
few users) but program is provided by central government, so we are stuck with 
it. I wonder if it was just running same time as backups perhaps...

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brian Desmond 
        Sent: Thu 18/05/2006 23:34 
        To: [email protected] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
        
        

        Access database will likely get cached on the client in memory, in any 
case it’d be all read ops. Access doesn’t cache report output. 

         

        Thanks,
        Brian Desmond

        [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

         

        c - 312.731.3132

         

         

  _____  

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Wade
        Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 6:22 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice

         

        
        For file sharing, I would consider 0Ư but 5 would be more likely since 
you
        probably want/need the space more than the speed. File sharing doesn't
        really beat the disks up relative to a busy DC even in large 
multi-thousand
        user file servers I have seen. 

         

        What about when some idiot user sets up an Access database on one and 
runs "inappropriate" reports against it.. 

         

         

         

        It is why most normal server admins really
        have no clue what to look for in terms of IO load on servers but any
        Exchange Admin worth anything is looking at that right away in a problem
        situation and able to quote IOPS stats off the top of their head and 
know
        what they can get from the underlying disk subsystem. Exchange disk 
configs
        are critical.

        **********************************************************************

        This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

        intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they

        are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to 
disclose this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of Information 
Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in 
the Act. 

        If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport e-Services 
via [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then permanently remove it from your system. 

        Thank you.

        http://www.stockport.gov.uk

        **********************************************************************

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to