Depends on the data..... These days with identity theft rampant... anything with a PII element would be on a desktop over my dead body.

Software suppliers also tell me to run as admin and these days we need to push strongly back on that as well.

Access works for a 'small' multi user app.. and I do mean small.

Dave Wade wrote:
Joe,
Well all agree on that, however we are pretty much stuck with the apps in question "as-is" as the software is supplied "from above" (e.g. the stuff from www.ncer.org <http://www.ncer.org>). These days I copy the database onto a users PC and they run the reports and analysis locally, as that's what the software supplier tells them to do, and the users are happy with that. Dave.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *joe
*Sent:* 23 May 2006 04:38
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice

Access is crap to use for a multiuser app. Don't discount the fact that the perf could be simply related to that. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Dave Wade
*Sent:* Thursday, May 18, 2006 7:08 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice

Its the one thing that seems to give us performance issues. Last time I investigated things running slow, client was quiet (low CPU short disk queue, minimal paging) , network was quiet yet response was slow. Conclusion was that server was some how bottle neck. I must admit I didn't do much work on investigation. I think they should use appropriate tool such as msde (only a few users) but program is provided by central government, so we are stuck with it. I wonder if it was just running same time as backups perhaps...

    -----Original Message-----
    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brian Desmond
    *Sent:* Thu 18/05/2006 23:34
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Cc:*
    *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice

    Access database will likely get cached on the client in memory, in
    any case it’d be all read ops. Access doesn’t cache report output.

    *Thanks,**
    *Brian Desmond**

    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

    *c - 312.731.3132*

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Dave Wade
    *Sent:* Thursday, May 18, 2006 6:22 PM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice


    For file sharing, I would consider 0Ư but 5 would be more likely
    since you
    probably want/need the space more than the speed. File sharing doesn't
    really beat the disks up relative to a busy DC even in large
    multi-thousand
    user file servers I have seen.

    What about when some idiot user sets up an Access database on one
and runs "inappropriate" reports against it..
    It is why most normal server admins really
    have no clue what to look for in terms of IO load on servers but any
    Exchange Admin worth anything is looking at that right away in a
    problem
    situation and able to quote IOPS stats off the top of their head
    and know
    what they can get from the underlying disk subsystem. Exchange
    disk configs
    are critical.

    **********************************************************************

    This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

    intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they

    are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to
    disclose this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of
    Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by
    one of the exemptions in the Act.

    If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport
    e-Services via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and then permanently remove
    it from your system.

    Thank you.

    http://www.stockport.gov.uk

    **********************************************************************

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to