Ajay? Didn't you already ask this earlier?
(and if you only knew how funny it is to ask a SBS MVP about child
domains... cause I'd be googling the activedir listserve or asking in a
Exchange 2003 listserve....'cause we don't got 'em)
(speaking of which ... is there a search box on the archives? I can't
find it? http://www.activedir.org/ml/thrd2.aspx )
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mailing problem exchange 2003 server
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:08:40 +1000
From: Blair, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Ajay,
Need to put OT in the topic for this one...with the limited information
I am going to presume that the other domain is running Exchange as
well...You need to create an SMTP connector between parent root server
and their Exchange server.
Exchange System Manager - Administrative Groups - <RespectiveGroup> -
Routing Groups - Connectors - <RespectiveGroup> - New SMTP Connector
They would of course have to do the same thing and if a firewall is in
place you will need to open the respective ports...
James Blair
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ajay Kumar
Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2006 3:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Mailing problem exchange 2003 server
Dear all,
I have parent root server, in which exchange server 2003 installed and I
have other child domain in same forest.
Can any tell me how can send and recieve mails between parent and child
Domain.
Thank & Regards,
Ajay
Ajay Kumar wrote:
On 5/29/06, *Ajay Kumar* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi Susan,
Thanks for your support giving me details.
One more thing I want to know, I have just installed win2k3
exchange server on 2k3 parent root server and I made child domain
in a forest.
I have created mailbox user on both domain, But when I send mails
from child domain users its ask for authentication and Global
catalog can't be contected.But when I send mails through parent
mailbox user in same domain (parent) its works.
Pls suggest me what I have to do to make mailing between child and
parent doamin ? ?
Regards,
Ajay
On 5/29/06, *Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]* <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
.. well let me throw this back to you.. what do you want in
terms of
features? What's the reason for the question?
Is it from a "I'm an admin migrating from 2k to 2k3 so how
much new
stuff do I need to learn".. or is it "we're deploying a new
server" or
is it "we're thinking of upgrading"
Okay so here we are in 2006... to me deploying a 6 year old
anything
(because we all know that while Exchange 2000 is 'called'
2000.. the
bulk of that code was written when Prince was still dancing
around and
partying like it was 1999 and even earlier. So first and
foremost.. to
me.. the question is not.. "what's the difference between 2000
and 2003"
but rather.....
Do I upgrade/new deploy 2003 now or wait until the Exchange
2007 with
Monad and all that stuff comes out?
In my mind if you are doing a new deployment... 2000 is dead in my
mind. It's not even worth the consideration.
If your are currently on NT... that's even more dead as it's
officially
dead from a tech support standpoint. And there's probably a
budgetary
reason or some stupid line of business (probably an accounting
application) that won't support the upgrade.
So the question back at you is.. what are you using now? What
are your
needs that aren't being met now?
I already told you why Exchange 2003 sp2 in terms of features
is the way
to go for a Standard box
1. 75 gigs of storage
2. Exchange IMF v2
3. Mobility security pack/remote wipe/ I don't have to
install some
Blackberry software... we just buy Mobile 3 or 5 phones
4. Better security/permissions/ etc.
5. Outlook over http
6. OWA more near Outlookishy
I include the better recoverability as part of that "feature"
list as
well. And a feature for me on 2003 versus 2000 is the
"community" of
2003. I can't remember a dang thing at all about the NT
platform and
starting to lose 2k info. So I want to stay in the 'sweet
spot' of
community and support.
Now in terms of Exchange 2007.... we're going to be set free
of those
x86/32 bit limitations and up on the 64 bit platform... so
you'll need
to hardware proof yourself. If you are on 2000 right now.. and
are
looking to upgrade right now to 2003... should the firm wait
for 2007?
Boy I can't tell you that.... that's something that you'll need to
decide for your organization.
If on NT... get on 2k3.
If on 2000.. we're starting to get to that ..hmmmm.... are we
getting to
that time frame that maybe we need to wait for 2007 if we are
willing to
be an early adopter and jump soon after it ships and not wait for
Exchange 2007 sp1?
But I'm not an unbiased person here.. I have Software
Assurance so it's
already proven that I'm insane.
But I'm still not sure of what's the reason for the
question? As an
admin point of view ..the System Manager between the 2k and
2k3 looks
pretty close to one another.. it's the Monad era stuff in
Exchange 2007
that will be the learning curve era for me.
Ajay Kumar wrote:
> Susan Bradley,
>
> Can U tell me different in exchnage *in term of feature* ?.
> And thanks for giving me details in same.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ajay
>
>
> On 5/29/06, *Dave Wade* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> I usually answer "3" to questions like this..... Why?
Well its too
> general an open ended for a list like this. You know whats
> important in your deployemnt, we can only guess. So:-
>
> 1. If you want general info there is a wealth of
information on
> the MS web site, read it taking care to concentrate on
the bits
> that you are interested in.
>
> 2, If you are considering an upgrade describe your
existing system
> and ask whats in it for you, or highlight areas of concern
>
> 3. If you are considering a new deployment, deploy 2003.
>
> Dave Wade
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on behalf of
Ajay Kumar
> Sent: Sun 28/05/2006 07:00
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc:
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Different between Exchange 2000 and
2003
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Can any one pls tell me what's deffernet between
Exchange
> 2000 and 2003.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ajay.
>
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they
> are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be
required to
> disclose this email, or any response to it, under the
Freedom of
> Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is
covered by
> one of the exemptions in the Act.
>
> If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport
> e-Services via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> and then permanently
remove
> it from your system.
>
> Thank you.
>
> http://www.stockport.gov.uk <http://www.stockport.gov.uk/>
>
**********************************************************************
>
>
>
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
