How to work with the Exchange Recipient Update Service:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=319065

The Recipient Update Service Uncovered:
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF017.html

Exchange 2003 Server - How to configure the RUS:
http://www.computerperformance.co.uk/exchange2003/exchange2003_recipient_update_service.htm

You Had Me At EHLO... : Troubleshooting the Recipient Update Service (RUS) using Event Logs - Part 1:
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2004/07/07/175444.aspx


Ajay Kumar wrote:

Joe,
1. I have run domain prep on child domain.
2.I didn't setup RUS. Pls tell me where I have to set up and how ?
3. yes.
4. No child domain user can't send mail to parent root domain.
5. Yes.
6.Normal permission I have given on parent root domain ( Exchange server ). Regards, Ajay On 5/29/06, *joe* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    1. Did you run domain prep on the child domain?
    2. Did you set up a RUS to handle the child domain stamping?
    3. Did the child domain user's ID get properly stamped with all of
    the appropriate attributes?
    4. Can a child domain user send an email to another child domain
    users?
    5. Where are the child domain user's mailboxes at, on the Exch
    server in the parent domain?
    6. Does the child user have normal access to the parent domain or
    possibly has someone done some creative permissioning?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] *On Behalf Of *Ajay Kumar
    *Sent:* Monday, May 29, 2006 1:07 AM

    *To:* [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] Different between Exchange 2000 and 2003

Hi Susan, Thanks for your support giving me details.
    One more thing I want to know, I have just installed win2k3
    exchange server on 2k3 parent root server and I made child domain
    in a forest.
    I have created mailbox user on both domain, But when I send mails
    from child domain users its ask for authentication and Global
    catalog can't be contected.But when I send mails through parent
    mailbox user in same domain (parent) its works.
    Pls suggest me what I have to do to make mailing between child and
    parent doamin ? ?
Regards,
    Ajay


On 5/29/06, *Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]* <
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

        .. well let me throw this back to you.. what do you want in
        terms of
        features?  What's the reason for the question?

        Is it from a "I'm an admin migrating from 2k to 2k3 so how
        much new
        stuff do I need to learn".. or is it "we're deploying a new
        server" or
        is it  "we're thinking of upgrading"

        Okay so here we are in 2006... to me deploying a 6 year old
        anything
        (because we all know that while Exchange 2000 is 'called'
        2000.. the
        bulk of that code was written when Prince was still dancing
        around and
        partying like it was 1999 and even earlier.  So first and
        foremost.. to
        me.. the question is not.. "what's the difference between 2000
        and 2003"
        but rather.....

        Do I upgrade/new deploy 2003 now or wait until the Exchange
        2007 with
        Monad and all that stuff comes out?

        In my mind if you are doing a new deployment... 2000 is dead in my
        mind.  It's not even worth the consideration.

        If your are currently on NT... that's even more dead as it's
        officially
        dead from a tech support standpoint.  And there's probably a
        budgetary
        reason or some stupid line of business (probably an accounting
        application) that won't support the upgrade.

        So the question back at you is.. what are you using now?  What
        are your
        needs that aren't being met now?

        I already told you why Exchange 2003 sp2 in terms of features
        is the way
        to go for a Standard box

        1.  75 gigs of storage
        2.  Exchange IMF v2
        3.  Mobility security pack/remote wipe/ I don't have to
        install some
        Blackberry software... we just buy Mobile 3 or 5 phones
        4.  Better security/permissions/ etc.
        5. Outlook over http
        6.  OWA more near Outlookishy

        I include the better recoverability as part of that "feature"
        list as
        well.  And a feature for me on 2003 versus 2000 is the
        "community" of
        2003.  I can't remember a dang thing at all about the NT
        platform and
        starting to lose 2k info.  So I want to stay in the 'sweet
        spot' of
        community and support.

        Now in terms of Exchange 2007.... we're going to be set free
        of those
        x86/32 bit limitations and  up on the 64 bit platform... so
        you'll need
        to hardware proof yourself. If you are on 2000 right now.. and
        are
        looking to upgrade right now to 2003... should the firm wait
        for 2007?
        Boy I can't tell you that.... that's something that you'll need to
        decide for your organization.

        If on NT... get on 2k3.
        If on 2000.. we're starting to get to that ..hmmmm.... are we
        getting to
        that time frame that maybe we need to wait for 2007 if we are
        willing to
        be an early adopter and jump soon after it ships and not wait for
        Exchange 2007 sp1?

        But I'm not an unbiased person here.. I have Software
        Assurance so it's
        already proven that I'm insane.

        But I'm still not sure of what's the reason for the
        question?  As an
        admin point of view ..the System Manager between the 2k and
        2k3 looks
        pretty close to one another.. it's the Monad era stuff in
        Exchange 2007
        that will be the learning curve era for me.





        Ajay Kumar wrote:
Susan Bradley,

Can U tell me different in exchnage *in term of feature* ?.
And thanks for giving me details in same.


Regards,
Ajay


On 5/29/06, *Dave Wade* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:

    I usually answer "3" to questions like this..... Why?
        Well its too
    general an open ended for a list like this. You know whats
    important in your deployemnt, we can only guess. So:-

    1. If you want general info there is a wealth of
        information on
    the MS web site, read it taking care to concentrate on
        the bits
    that you are interested in.

    2, If you are considering an upgrade describe your
        existing system
    and ask whats in it for you, or highlight areas of concern

    3. If you are considering a new deployment, deploy 2003.

    Dave Wade

    -----Original Message-----
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on behalf of
        Ajay Kumar
    Sent: Sun 28/05/2006 07:00
    To: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Cc:
    Subject: [ActiveDir] Different between Exchange 2000 and
        2003



           Hi all,

           Can any one pls tell me what's deffernet between
        Exchange
    2000 and 2003.


           Regards,

           Ajay.



        **********************************************************************
    This email and any files transmitted with it are
        confidential and
    intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
        to whom they
    are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be
        required to
    disclose this email,  or any response to it,  under the
        Freedom of
    Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is
        covered by
    one of the exemptions in the Act.

    If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport
    e-Services via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> and then permanently
        remove
    it from your system.

    Thank you.

    http://www.stockport.gov.uk <http://www.stockport.gov.uk/>
        **********************************************************************



        List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
        List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
        List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx




--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com
The SBS product team wants to hear from you:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2006/05/18/95865.aspx

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to