watch out for linked attributes (back-links and forward links)
 
when exporting info from e.g. user objects you will get for example the 
memberOf attribute. However, you will not be able to write it back (because it 
is owned by the system) as for that you need to write the corresponding member 
attribute of the group specified in the memberOf attribute of the user
 
step 12 from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/840001/ 
<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/840001/> 
 
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto
Senior Infrastructure Consultant
MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
 
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven)
(   Tel     : +31-(0)40-29.57.777
(   Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
*   E-mail : <see sender address>

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Teo De Las Heras
Sent: Fri 2006-06-02 19:52
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reanimate or Authoritatively Restore objects


Joe,
 
Thanks for the feedback.  I wrote a script to do an ldifde daily and set it as 
a scheduled task.  I wrote another script that will take the information that 
ldifde exports to re-populate the re-animated objects.
 
Teo

 
On 5/31/06, joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        It depends on what info you have captured for the objects, what info is 
scrubbed in the tombstone, and how you personally feel about it. 
         
        I personally prefer to reanimate objects over restoring them. When you 
do a restore there is always a possibility you can hurt yourself pretty bad. 
Reanimation is much less dangerous but if the info isn't there and you don't 
know what to populate manually and you need the old info, you don't have a lot 
of choice. 
         
          joe

________________________________

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of Teo De Las Heras
        Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:08 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [ActiveDir] Reanimate or Authoritatively Restore objects
        
         
        
        In reference to the following KB article:
        http://support.microsoft.com/kb/840001/
         
        In a Domain and Forest that is at a 2003 functional level, is it better 
to reanimate objects from the deleted items container or authoritatively 
restore them?
         
         




This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all 
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to