Generally speaking, no, they won't break. It gets a little complicated.
Let's say that the application is a single MSI with embedded files. That MSI
gets cached on the workstation during install. So if, for example, the app
needs to be repaired or removed, then it will find that cached MSI and life
is good. Where it gets tricky is when the app is composed of an MSI and
separate CAB files. If those files go away (on the server) and the app needs
to reference them, then you get that annoying dialog about having to enter
the path to the install files. What I was referring to below is, if you need
to move a package from one server to another and still want that GPO
application relationship to be maintained on the workstation, that process
of moving the package, and then having to create a new GPO package, will
typically trigger a reinstall on the client, to re-establish that
relationship between client and GPO. 

Hope that helps.

Darren

Darren Mar-Elia
For comprehensive Windows Group Policy Information, check out
www.gpoguy.com-- the best source for GPO tips, tools and whitepapers. Also
check out the Windows Group Policy Guide, a soup-to-nuts resource for Group
Policy information.
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 2:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit


Are you saying that if I deployed an MSI to a bunch of users from a single
fileshare and later get rid of that share, all those users GPO installed
apps are going to break even though they completely have the software
installed?


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

Russ-
The right answer with Software Installation is pretty much to always use
DFS. That way if the package ever has to physically move off of a server,
the path doesn't have to change. Path changes aren't supported in GPSI
without a re-install. So,to answer your question, yes, I would use DFS to
distribute the package. There is no way to control the deployment rate,
unfortunately, unless you artificially do it using something like security
filters--where you gradually add regional-based groups to the security
filter on the GPO as the previous groups deploy the package.


Darren

Darren Mar-Elia
For comprehensive Windows Group Policy Information, check out
www.gpoguy.com-- the best source for GPO tips, tools and whitepapers.
Also check out the Windows Group Policy Guide, a soup-to-nuts resource for
Group Policy information.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit


I'm wanting to deploy an MSI (office communicator) to 100% of the desktops
in our domain.  These desktops are scattered across the world over various
wan links.  I'd like to deploy it with a GPO (assign the software, not force
the install), but I also don't want to kill our wan links.  Is there any way
to limit the number of concurrent deployments of a software package assigned
to 9500+ users?  Or is the right answer to use DFS so they don't all pull
from the central fileserver?


Thanks

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information of Cameron
and its operating Divisions and may be confidential or privileged.

This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used only by the
addressee. If you have received this message in error please delete it,
together with any attachments, from your system.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information of Cameron
and its operating Divisions and may be confidential or privileged.

This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used only by the
addressee. If you have received this message in error please delete it,
together with any attachments, from your system.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to