Myrick, Todd (NIH/CC/DCRI) [E] wrote:
Some of my opinions based on my own research.

   1. I prefer hot swappable hardware RAID 1 for all boot / system
      partitions no matter what the role of the server is.  To me this
      gives the fastest disaster recovery option for situations you are
      unsure about with regards to OS updates and single drive
      failures.  On a side note we used to use three mirrors for our
      domain controller setups. 1 for system/boot/syslog, 1 for
      transaction logs, and 1 for data.  We mirrored this after our
      exchange setup, except in Exchange we used RAID 5 arrays to store
      the data.
   2. With regards to number of spindles and performance, I discussed
      this with someone on the list before (Guido) and people at HP and
      we came to the conclusion that with the latest 15K drives you
      won’t see any tangible performance improvements going with
      multiple mirrors unless you DC’s service more than 5000 people in
      that location where the DC resides.

I had a feeling that 15K drives wouldn't buy me much. After some reading last night I'm even more convinced. For our size I think I'll be going with 2 mirror sets and as much memory as we can afford.

   3. Judging from the original posters SMTP information, it looks like
      his organization has less than 5000 people in it, so I recommend
      his first option.


While my 'organization' has less that 5000 employees we can have from 1-4000 visitors here at any time. With the Accelerator running (as it is now) we'll be crowded for the next 1.5 years.


Follow-up thoughts looking for group input.

With regards to when is it best to use Software RAID, I have debated this with several people and I seem to favor this approach in Virtual Server Environments and using it on the System/Boot Partition for DR purposes. Another possible use for the software based mirroring might be to create live copy of server for duplication purposes (personally I think there are much better approaches out there.) Any thoughts on this?

What Disk type do you all recommend? I currently still stick to the Basic Disk for the most part. (Unless I want to use software based fault-tolerance).


We use basic for most for the most part. The only time I use dynamic is when I have to create a large (>5TB) volume on some of the SATA boxes that we have that host some large-ish SQL databases.

        al

--

Al Lilianstrom
CD/CSS/CSI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to