|
Correct me if I’m over simplifying
things here…but doesn’t 2047GB = 1.99TB (not 2.47TB) since 1024GB =
1TB…right? From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose Quick question. I just finished building two new 2003
servers running Microsoft Clustering services and presented two 2047 So why I am only seeing 1.99 TB on a 2.47 TB LUN? Is any
one else running a larger LUN size using NTFS? Any issues or corruption of the
MSFT that I should no about? My apologies in advance for the newbie question ( I really
should know this answer ). Sincerely, "Anyone who has never made a mistake
has never tried anything new." Albert E |
- RE: [ActiveDir] NTFS ( 16 Exabyte's ) Steve Linehan
- Re: [ActiveDir] NTFS ( 16 Exabyte's ... Jose Medeiros
- RE: [ActiveDir] NTFS ( 16 Exabyt... Brian Desmond
- RE: [ActiveDir] NTFS ( 16 Ex... Ken Schaefer
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT NTFS ... Myrick, Todd \(NIH/CC/DCRI\) [E]
- RE: [ActiveDir] NTFS ( 16 Exabyt... Steve Linehan
- RE: [ActiveDir] NTFS ( 16 Exabyte's ... Alex Fontana
- RE: [ActiveDir] NTFS ( 16 Exabyte's ... Medeiros, Jose

