Hi, I'm not saying that teaming should not be used... I'm saying that teaming in load balancing mode should not be used as MS does not support it. Teaming in fault tolerance mode can be used for this. More info can be found here: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/wssra/raguide/DirectoryServices/igdrbp_2.mspx search for "load balancing" Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards, Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto Senior Infrastructure Consultant MVP Windows Server - Directory Services LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven) ( Tel : +31-(0)40-29.57.777 ( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80 * E-mail : <see sender address>
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Freddy HARTONO Sent: Thu 2006-07-13 17:09 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers Hi Jorge Aha, does that happen to be a link somewhere on the net that I can reference to? Personally for DC I never find a need for adapter teaming, if the nic dies and I get an alert from the monitoring server that's all good for me - clients should failover elsewhere anyway... So any bullets against teaming would be excellent! Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono Group Support Engineer InternationalSOS Pte Ltd mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (+65) 6330-9785 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers In the "Windows Server System Reference Architecture" (WSSRA) Microsoft states: "At this time, Microsoft does not support load balanced network teams on domain controllers due to potential data corruption issues" (Taken from the Directory Services Blueprint - page 29) >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul >>>Williams >>>Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 13:50 >>>To: [email protected] >>>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers >>> >>>We team everything. It seems stupid not too. Use fault tolerance >>>only (as opposed to load balancing) and you've got additional >>>resilliency. FT works fine with different paths, e.g. different >>>switches. >>> >>> >>>--Paul >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Freddy HARTONO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: <[email protected]> >>>Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:02 AM >>>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers >>> >>> >>>> Don't mean to hijack this thread but on a similar note - whats the >>>> downside for installing DCs with Adapter Teaming? >>>> >>>> All I know is that when adapter teaming is enabled, setting up WINS >>>> service will pops and error message (which can be ignored)...but >>>> anything else? I've always been a firm believer of one nic and no >>>> teaming... >>>> >>>> Any comments? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you and have a splendid day! >>>> >>>> Kind Regards, >>>> >>>> Freddy Hartono >>>> Group Support Engineer >>>> InternationalSOS Pte Ltd >>>> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> phone: (+65) 6330-9785 >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >>>Susan Bradley, >>>> CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:41 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers >>>> >>>> In the year 2006.. I hope we are still not making host >>>file entries on >>>> servers and workstations.... :-) >>>> >>>> Peter Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>>> You might want to then create entries in the host file on >>>the backup >>>>> server so that you guarantee that the backup server >>>always uses the >>>>> right network connection. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------- >>>--------- >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Robert >>>>> Rutherford >>>>> *Sent:* 12 July 2006 12:57 >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No issues, if you... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Go to the TCP/IP settings of the backup network card, >>>click advanced, >>>>> goto the DNS tab and untick register the connection in DNS. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Robert Rutherford* >>>>> *QuoStar Solutions Limited* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The Enterprise Pavilion >>>>> Fern Barrow >>>>> Wallisdown >>>>> Poole >>>>> Dorset >>>>> BH12 5HH >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *T:* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +44 (0) 8456 440 331 >>>>> >>>>> *F:* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +44 (0) 8456 440 332 >>>>> >>>>> *M:* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +44 (0) 7974 249 494 >>>>> >>>>> *E: * >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> >>>>> *W: * >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> www.quostar.com <http://www.quostar.com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------- >>>--------- >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> **From:** [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of >>>*Jeff Green >>>>> *Sent:* 12 July 2006 11:43 >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> First posting to this list but I've lurked quite a >>>while and I've >>>> >>>>> been very impressed by the quality of replies by the gurus. >>>>> >>>>> My question is regarding the advisability of having >>>multihomed DCs. >>>>> Basically I want >>>>> to run backups over a separate GbE and as my servers have >>>dual inbuilt >>>> >>>>> NICs this seems an obvious route to take. I know there >>>are some issues >>>> >>>>> with DNS (I have a DNS integrated AD). >>>>> >>>>> Would this cause replication problems, etc ? >>>>> >>>>> Any other "gotchas" ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Many Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> Jeff Green >>>>> Network Support Manager >>>>> SAPIENS (UK) Ltd >>>>> t: +44 (0)1895 464228 f: +44 (0)1895 463098 >>>>> >>>>> "I dream of hover cars and old transistor radios ... She dreams of >>>>> flowers in a field of sunny bungalows" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------- >>>--------- >>>>> -- Confidentiality Note: The information contained in >>>this email and >>>>> document(s) attached are for the exclusive use of the >>>addressee and >>>>> may contain confidential, privileged and non-disclosable >>>information. >>>>> If the recipient of this email is not the addressee, such >>>recipient is >>>> >>>>> strictly prohibited from reading, photocopying, distribution or >>>>> otherwise using this email or its contents in any way. >>>>> >>>>> Please notify the Sapiens (UK) Ltd. Systems Administrator >>>via e-mail >>>>> immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED], if you have >>>received this >>>> >>>>> email in error. >>>>> >>>>> Disclaimer: The views, opinions and guidelines contained in this >>>>> confidential e-mail are those of the originating author >>>and may not be >>>> >>>>> representative of Sapiens (UK) Ltd. >>>>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------- >>>--------- >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? >>>> http://www.threatcode.com >>>> >>>> If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS >>>Blog... man ... I >>>> will hunt you down... >>>> http://blogs.technet.com/sbs >>>> >>>> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >>>> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >>>> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx >>>> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >>>> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >>>> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx >>> >>>List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >>>List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >>>List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx >>> This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
<<winmail.dat>>
