|
Amen. Does anyone else have departments
which refuse to: A) Migrate from old NT 4 domain B) Apply SP2 on Windows XP workstations C) Insist that Word Processing technology reached it’s zenith
with Word Perfect 5.1 (for DOS) D) ____ Fill in the blank E) All of the above Just because the old app might not work and no one has the time to
test or that they may need to learn new things? By the way, if anyone from my clients subscribe
to this list, then this post was written by my good-for-nothing second-cousin…. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of joe I love Brian's responses. I expect some
people may think responses like this are harsh but the reality of the situation
is that Brian, although young, has been involved in running some seriously
large environments and seen a lot of stupid crap and learned the lesson that
you need to remove stupid apps from the environment until they are fixes... You
don't keep things running for people if it is stupid unless everyone is aware
of the stupidity and agreed upon it. You don't go into a meeting with the
opinion you are going to figure out how to support the apps doing stupid
things, you go in with the opinion and stating it loudly that they shouldn't be
doing it stupid and need to fix it. If you don't, you as an admin, will spend
most of your time dealing with stupid apps and their requirements versus what
your real job should be, running AD properly. Also any time you want to upgrade
the environment you will be stuck dealing with the real requirements of apps
running properly as well as really stupid requirements of apps that weren't
written properly and it is usually the latter that will hold you back. Why is
this bad you ask??? Because some day at some point, your management's
management is going to look at them and say you need to cut some costs and that
is going to come all the way back to you and you will either lose hours or
coworkers and you will still be trying to support all of these stupid apps that
you let through previously. Trying to get them to change then is nearly
impossible because they have come to expect the level of service from you of
you supporting their stupid ass requirements. :) joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Desmond Will be fine unless you have some app hardcoded to them and well it
should break so you can demand to have it fixed. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Carter Hi, I need to rename some of my AD Sites, is this likely to cause any
issues I am unaware off? I use DFS if thats any help. Windows 2003 Single Domain/Forest FFL. thanks James Do you Yahoo!? |
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Sites Re... joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Sit... Richard Kline
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD... joe
- Re: [ActiveDir... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
- RE: [Activ... joe
- RE: [Activ... Brian Desmond
- Re: [... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
