Yeah but see when I focus in on the areas you're weak in you could still talk 
your way out of it instead of making up some goofy ass bs that I have to write 
down when I get off the phone and file in my resumes and interviews folder. 

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

c - 312.731.3132


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 12:30 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Interview Techniques
> 
> Does it pay well with good bene's?
> 
> While I have a nice job now, I always look at available opportunities.
> :)
> 
> Don't have Brian interview me though, I expect I would come up short
> and I would have to show how much I like the phrases "it depends" and
> "I don't know". I have no doubt that Brian could bury me in an
> interview, or anyone for that matter if they have a good understanding
> of the product and can find the focuses I have and avoid those areas
> and stick to areas they focus on. Again... No one can answer any
> question anyone can ask about AD. I am sure that most everyone on this
> list has probably seen something that most others haven't seen.
> 
> For instance, right up until yesterday I could have been tripped up on
> what the default tombstone lifetime is in a freshly built R2 forest. I
> would have quoted what the correct answer should have been, not what it
> actually was.
> The only people who would have known different are those that would
> have had some reason to do it  and noticed the value or have read
> something written about it or windiffed the schema.ini file for some
> reason against the SP1 version. Basically there are two types of
> knowing... Experience and theoretical where theoretical is what you
> have read or been told or what you derive yourself based on what you
> have experienced or been told or read. No one has experienced it all
> though people in key spots will have been in a position to have heard
> of a lot of things.
> 
> 
>   joe
> 
> 
> --
> O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mudha Godasa
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:38 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Interview Techniques
> 
> I will absolutely let you know of all the gory details. I sure hope I
> dont get an $%^$£"! for a boss.
> ;-)
> 
> Cheers
> 
> P.S. Anyone want a job? ;0)
> 
> 
> --- Al Mulnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I have to laugh.  This thread is starting to sound like the six blind
> > men describing an elephant.
> >
> > As was mentioned, it is very hard to find somebody who can do the
> > high-level design at all 8 layers, manage a staff of people, and
> still
> > fit that into a
> > 23 hour day. If you find one, keep him or her. If you don't find one,
> > don't be terribly disappointed; look for one that's close and has the
> > right personality to be made into one. There's plenty more of those,
> > but be sure you're ready to keep him/her later because there are
> > others looking for that type of person :)
> >
> > FWIW, I think interviewing wtih Brian might be a laugh.  Can you
> > answer all the questions?  Nope.  Not every one. But you can still
> > enjoy it and I think Neil was wise enough to mention that, "no, I
> > don't know it all but I do know how to use a book" :)  (ok, so I
> > paraphrased.  The point is that you use it or lose it.  But knowing
> > what questions to ask and where to find the answers is far more
> > resilient than knowing everything there is to know about a product
> set
> > on a given day.  Most of the players on the team that wrote the
> > application or product don't know either.  But they do know where to
> > go for the answers....)
> >
> > One thing that does come to mind would be to follow Brian's advice
> and
> > ask open ended questions.  Those are going to be the hardest because
> > you're not going to be able to study for that. You'll have to walk
> > through it under the pressure of an interview.  That will tell the
> > interviewer a lot about the person and what they would do 6 months
> > from now when the technology is totally different and how they would
> > deal with your unique situations.
> >
> >
> > Best of luck in you hiring endeavors. I for one am interested to hear
> > a follow up in a few months to hear how it went.
> >
> >
> > Al
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/24/06, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >   I suppose there are several "roles" that senior
> > people could hold: some
> > > are managerial, some are architectural, and some
> > are deeply technical (i.e.
> > > high level support). Architects, in that taxonomy,
> > would do design work.
> > > Whereas a PSS engineer would probably spend more
> > time with a debugger than
> > > using Word and Visio to produce high-level
> > designs.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
> > *
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > *Sent:* Monday, 24 July 2006 5:53 PM
> > >
> > > *To:* [email protected]
> > > *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Interview
> > Techniques
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A senior guy IMO should be more focused on
> > "design" aspects than "support"
> > > and thus should be able to answer questions along
> > the line of:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "*How would you design a schema change process,
> > encompassing initial
> > > request through to implementation*."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The answer to the above should help determine alot
> > of info from that
> > > person (see below) - even if they cannot answer
> > the question fully.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  - Does this person think logically
> > >
> > >  - Does this person explain ideas in a cohesive
> > manner
> > >
> > >  - Does this person answer questions with fluff
> > and BS or are they
> > > succinct
> > >
> > >  - etc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To answer 'what do the FSMOs do?' one can simply
> > state - "I'd look it up
> > > in a book". I'd therefore always try to ask
> > questions which can only be
> > > answered through experience (where possible) and
> > not just through reading a
> > > book.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > My 2 penneth,
> > >
> > > neil
> > >  ------------------------------
> > >
> > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
> > *mike kline
> > > *Sent:* 24 July 2006 07:16
> > > *To:* [email protected]
> > > *Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Interview
> > Techniques
> > >
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > That was a good story, very funny.  So what did
> > the guy do? Did he just
> > > get up and leave?  I know from reading your posts
> > you are usually straight
> > > and to the point. I would be sweating if I had to
> > interview with you.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Going off course a bit.  What are some types of AD
> > questions that you all
> > > consider to be "senior level"?   For example what
> > if you ask someone how to
> > > do a metadata cleanup?  Would you all consider
> > that to be a mid level
> > > question?   Just wondering because I always
> > grapple trying to figure out
> > > questions for the mid vs. senior level candidate.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/23/06, *Brian Desmond*
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've got no second thoughts about being an asshole
> > during a tech
> > > interview. I ask the question, you either answer
> > it or tell me you don't
> > > know. If you choose not to tell me you don't know
> > and demonstrate that
> > > you don't know through what you tell me instead,
> > I'm already pretty much
> > > through. If you're arrogant like this candidate
> > you describe, I'm likely
> > > through as well.
> > >
> > > My favorite exchange as of late goes like this:
> > >
> > > Me - Tell me a little bit about your experience
> > migrating Exchange 5.5
> > > orgs to 2003
> > > Them - blah blah blah
> > > Me - Ok, can you name the three types of
> > connection agreements in the
> > > ADC?
> > > Them - well uh blah blah well uh excuse excuse Me - other questions
> > > Me - So would you be comfortable migrating a 10K
> > user 5.5 org to 2003?
> > > Them - Absolutely
> > > Me - How can you be comfortable doing that when
> > you can't even explain
> > > the first step of the migration to me?
> > >
> > >
> > > In any case, others have put some really good
> > advice here. What you want
> > > in a technical lead is someone who can get their
> > hands dirty without
> > > getting scared or screwing up. They should also
> > have no second thoughts
> > > about delegating work and asking their
> > subordinates for help. That
> > > person needs to be able to deal with upper
> > management, and they also
> > > need to make sure their self esteem is in check -
> > none of that "I did X"
> > > when all they did is watch. Hiring your new
> > manager can be a little
> > > difficult on both sides from the point of view of
> > why wasn't someone on
> > > your team promoted to that position?
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to