|
changing the permissions to read only on the DFS roots is
no issue at all (doesn't matter what type of server the root is hosted on - DC
or member). I'd actually replace everyone with Auth. Users at the same
time.
as for Kevin's other comment on using Win2000 for DFS vs.
Win2003 or R2 - totally agree that especially R2 has extensive improvements in
the DFS service itself and especially in the file-replication engine (DFS-R).
But if Bryan is not using file-replication in this Win2000 environment and
"only" needs to build a hierarchy of shares, he can already get quite far with
Win2000 DFS roots. Ofcourse there have been advancement such as multiple
DFS roots per server in 2003 and further cool stuff for the basic DFS service in
R2, such as sub-folder hierarchy for the DFS links, but Bryan may not need
them.
Fully agree though, if file replication is involved, DFS-R
in R2 is much preferred over FRS in Win2000 and Win2003 (RTM). Really depends on
your situation if you need it.
/Guido From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Brunson Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Securing DFS I have never had any
problems caused by changing permissions on a DFS root. One thing to
consider before you move too far down the road of configuration though is if you
really want to invest in a 2000 DFS structure when the 2003 R2 DFS structure is
so much more robust and reliable. I have had and heard of countless
problems with 2000 DFS. I have not had any problems with 2003 R2 DFS at
all. If you decide to move forward with 2000 DFS, be aware that they will
probably stop replicating occasionally. You will then spend hours
troubleshooting. Seriously it is worth building this on 2003 R2 servers
even if you don’t currently have any, if you are doing anything with DFS.
I know that is not what you are asking, sorry.
Anyone
disagree? From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lucas,
Bryan We built a DFS Root on a windows
2000 domain controller and the root of the share has “Everyone” Full
Control. E.g. if I go to \\domain.com,
right click on the dfs root’s properties, the security
tab. Can I simply take FC away? I’m
a bit hesitant because it lives on the DC and came this way by
default. Bryan
Lucas Server
Administrator |
- RE: [ActiveDir] Securing DFS Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
- RE: [ActiveDir] Securing DFS Grillenmeier, Guido
- RE: [ActiveDir] Securing DFS Kevin Brunson
- RE: [ActiveDir] Securing DFS Lucas, Bryan
- RE: [ActiveDir] Securing DFS Kinzer, Lowell
