The part that makes me wonder about the "story" is if it stores no secrets is the server doing anything for me? Is there a point to deploying the server in a remote office other than just being able to point to it in the closet and say, "see, I do to earn my paycheck!"
I'm sure there's more, but I don't yet know which parts are public information and which are NDA.
Can you tell I'm concerned about the story being created? I like stories; don't get me wrong. But I'm concerned that the story being spun up might be missing the mark and lead a few people astray.
Safe to note that there are some features that differentiate the RODC from a NT4 BDC and that make it appealing in some cases.
But if it actually does not store anything locally, ever, then I'm not sure it's worth the time to deploy one now is it?
Al
On 7/27/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI:
http://blogs.msdn.com/jolson/archive/2006/07/27/679801.aspx
Read-Only Domain Controller and Server Core
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
