As a person who tests/patches a bunch of single DCs.... I've never seen
a "patch" kill a server.
Driver update may and has, yes.
Impair functionality of the server, yes.
But kill it completely? Microsoft tests patches ahead of time and they
would find ahead of time if basic functionality of a DC would be nailed.
But if the server dies... it was probably on the emergency list prior to
patching. Rebooting the box first ensures that you find these 'hospital
bound' servers.
Almeida Pinto, Jorge de wrote:
the reason is that is a DC dies during the patching you do not have to seize
the roles....IMHO, I prefer transfering over seizing
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto
Senior Infrastructure Consultant
MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven)
( Tel : +31-(0)40-29.57.777
( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
* E-mail : <see sender address>
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John Strongosky
Sent: Thu 2006-08-17 16:55
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question.
I cornfused is this a standard practice as I thought you did not want to move the FMSO roles back and forth.
john
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question.
in addition to that....
DC1 having FSMOset1 and DC2 having FSMOset2
transfer FSMOset1 from DC1 to DC2
apply patches to DC1 and reboot and check everything (event logs DCdiag, etc)
if everything OK!
transfer FSMOset1 and FSMOset2 from DC2 to DC1
apply patches to DC2 and reboot and check everything (event logs DCdiag, etc)
if everything OK!
transfer FSMOset2 from DC1 to DC2
voila (that's french)...done! ;-)
jorge
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deji
Akomolafe
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 01:52
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question.
It doesn't matter.
Sincerely,
_____
(, / | /) /) /)
/---| (/_ ______ ___// _ // _
) / |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/ /)
(/
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.akomolafe.com - we know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
________________________________
From: John Strongosky
Sent: Tue 8/8/2006 4:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question.
We have our FMSO roles split between 2 dc's. They are Schema
Master/Domain Tree Operator on 1 and on 2, the roles PDC Emulator/Rid
Pool/Intrastate on the other. After I apply the patches from Microsoft what is
the beat practices for the boot order...or does it matter?
1. Remote DC/GC's first
2. no. 1
3. then no 2.
thanks
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will
hunt you down...
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
