Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Printers & AD GUI
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto
Senior Infrastructure Consultant
MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
 
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven)
(   Tel     : +31-(0)40-29.57.777
(   Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
*   E-mail : <see sender address>


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of joe
Sent: Sun 2006-08-27 23:46
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Printers & AD GUI

Oh no kidding Brian... I had never heard that about the pruning... I hate to
ask this, but is there any documentation on that? That would totally explain
some things various folks have asked me about DCs spinning up dialup
connections at WAN sites every 8 hours...

  joe

--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 2:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Printers & AD GUI

Right. The computer is responsible for managing the print queue objects.
Any changes you make on the print server are reflected on the published
queue. Everytime the spooler service starts it confirms that the queue
objects for published printers are all still in the directory.

There is a thread that runs on every DC by default which prunes printer
objects. It attempts to contact the print server every eight hours and
if it can't after two intervals (8 hours by default) the printer objects
get deleted. If you move the printers out from under the computer
objects, then the pruning thread is the only way they will get cleaned
up unless you do it yourself.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

c - 312.731.3132


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 10:20 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Printers & AD GUI
>
> Print Queue objects are created by default under the computer on which
> the printers are shared from. It is, in fact, IMO, an extremely
logical
> way of handling it since you don't have to worry about delegating
> permissions to print admins, the computer itself can create/delete
them
> as necessary. MSMQ Queues are handled the same way as lots of objects,
> in my default R2 forest this is a list that can be handled this way
>
> applicationVersion
> classStore
> comConnectionPoint
> dSA
> indexServerCatalog
> intellimirrorSCP
> ipsecFilter
> ipsecISAKMPPolicy
> ipsecNegotiationPolicy
> ipsecNFA
> ipsecPolicy
> msDFSR-LocalSettings
> msDS-App-Configuration
> msDS-AppData
> msieee80211-Policy
> mSMQConfiguration
> mS-SQL-OLAPServer
> mS-SQL-SQLServer
> nTFRSSubscriptions
> printQueue
> remoteStorageServicePoint
> rpcGroup
> rpcProfile
> rpcProfileElement
> rpcServer
> rpcServerElement
> rRASAdministrationConnectionPoint
> serviceAdministrationPoint
> serviceConnectionPoint
> serviceInstance
> storage
> Volume
>
>
> As for why they are third class citizens in AD... I expect it is
> because they are. I haven't done excessive investigation into how
> printers are handled but I expect the print queue objects in AD are
> simply reflections of the actual print queues on the servers. I don't
> expect you actually manage anything in AD for them, you manage them on
> the server/ws and then the print spooler updates any info it wants in
> AD. Certainly you find them in AD but that just tells the underlying
> software where to go look and the software goes to that print queue
> directly on that server. I am pretty confident that if you delete a
> print queue object in AD the print queue will work continue to work
> fine on the server still, you just can't locate it via the AD.
> Contrast that with users, groups, computers, and other objects I
expect
> you consider first class citizens. If you delete those types of
> objects, you will find they no longer work at all. :)  You will note
> that when you create a queue, you get the option to publish it to the
> directory, it isn't mandatory, not required, it is simply an option.
>
>   joe
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 10:44 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Printers & AD GUI
>
> After 6 years of working with AD I just realized that when you unshare
> a printer it becomes invisible and unmanageable. I guess I always knew
> this in the back of my head, but it never hit home until I tried
> cleaning up the printer list.  Why are printers third-class citizens
of
> AD, without a container or a OU to their name?  The only way to
> remotely manage unshared printers is through the browse list, which is
> a pain.
> Am I missing something?  Are there other approaches to this? (no
> megabucks solutions, please)
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx



This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

Reply via email to