This is a Vista/Longhorn change as the event logging system has been
completely revamped.  I'm not, however, 100% certain about 64bit XP and 2003
on if they suffer from the same limitations as the 32bit flavors.  I suspect
they do. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Logging successful logons in AD security log
> 
> Interesting.
>  
> from the article: "Microsoft plans to resolve these problems 
> in the next version of Windows by rewriting the event logging 
> system from the ground up."  since the last update was Mar 28 
> 2003, I wonder how this applies to Wndows 2003 R2 and the 64 
> Bit versions of Windows, or if this will only be fixed in Longhorn.
>  
> Glenn
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris
> Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2006 7:20 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Logging successful logons in AD security log
> 
> 
> Does everyone know this recomendation from Microsoft?
> 
> On Windows XP, member servers, and stand-alone servers, the 
> combined size of the application, security, and system event 
> logs should not exceed 300 MB.
> On domain controllers, the combined size of these three logs 
> - plus the Directory Service, File Replication Service, and 
> DNS Server logs - should not exceed 300 MB.
> 
> http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/5a86ab0
> f-c7eb-45ed-9e
> 5e-514173bf15e31033.mspx?mfr=true
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu Aug 31 
> 04:12:18 2006
> Received: from smarthost1.giacom.net [194.131.240.55] by 
> mail1.giacom.net with SMTP; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 04:12:18 +0100
> Received: from mail.activedir.org ([12.168.66.190]) by 
> smarthost1.giacom.net with MailEnable ESMTP; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 
> 04:12:15 +0100
> Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com 
> [68.142.198.210] by mail.activedir.org
> (SMTPD32-8.15) id A27721B0148; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:07:35 -0400
> Received: (qmail 99368 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2006 
> 03:07:35 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.16.19?) 
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@69.106.185.80 with plain) by 
> smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2006 03:07:35 -0000
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; 
> d=pacbell.net; 
> h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Sub
> ject:Reference
> s:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
> b=PEIfvYwJhIYktsWE3wK8pnfo1RmbheeJg4LXCAQ1cS/3aIkBB+zWPBGoNL0v
> pHGQ7U+CwL+WPV
> R6qNv7o1jr4Xp9zMxBmnzKaUuWHbmSmTn++z6CEr/Q5njP0rjFViu7J0fVz2mv
> Ifjfh29qkH
> R6qNv7o1jr4Xp9zMxBmnzKaUuWHbmSmTn++O6+P
> EuYRMiJ3/EUAyhoBySfo8= ;
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:07:29 -0700
> From: "Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Logging successful logons in AD security log
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Precedence: bulk
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Received-SPF: none (smarthost1.giacom.net: mail.activedir.org 
> does not designate permitted sender hosts)
> X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12.168.66.190]
> X-Note: This E-mail was scanned in real-time by Giacom 
> Anti-Spam and Giacom Anti-Virus. Advanced Virus and Spam 
> protection is available to subscribers of Giacom Business Pro 
> Plus. Visit http://www.giacom.com for more details.
> X-Spam-Tests-Failed: ROUTING [-1]
> X-Note: This E-mail was sent from ([12.168.66.190]).
> X-Rcpt-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Ask the PSS security guys and they want success and failure. 
> Only having half the story... is only half the story....
> 
> Buy bigger harddrives and archive.
> 
> Sitton Glen E wrote:
> > I don't know that there is a 'general consensus' because everyone's 
> > business needs differ. My environment has around 100K users 
> and you're 
> > right, there's a ridiculously high volume of logon events. 
> We set the 
> > security log size very high on the domain controllers, and 
> collect and 
> > clear the security logs several times per day using a 
> > commercially-available "fancy log management system." We 
> don't allow 
> > the security logs to rollover. The eventlog management 
> software gives 
> > us an impressive battery of audit reports, and a compressed 
> eventlog 
> > repository that we archive for FISMA compliance.
> >
> > I'm sure our uncompressed event log archive is well above 
> 1TB per year.
> > But we realize about a 20:1 compression using the 
> commercial software.
> >
> > Your options may be limited by legal requirements that may 
> govern the 
> > audit logs of your business or organization.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, 
> > Joseph
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 5:32 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Logging successful logons in AD 
> security log
> >
> > That may work, but it sort of falls under option b. The 
> logs will grow 
> > so large that they will become unmanageable. I did some 
> calculations 
> > and it works out to be about 1TB a year.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Derek Harris
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:06 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Logging successful logons in AD 
> security log
> >
> > I have a pretty small site, and this probably won't scale 
> very well, 
> > but I have a script scheduled to run every day at midnight 
> that backs 
> > up the security log to a compressed folder & clears it. I 
> have the log 
> > size set ridiculously high, so it doesn't rollover unexpectedly.
> >
> > dtmThisDay = Day(Date)
> > dtmThisMonth = Month(Date)
> > dtmThisYear = Year(Date)
> > strBackupName = dtmThisYear & "_" & dtmThisMonth & "_" & 
> dtmThisDay & 
> > "_" & Hour(Time) & Minute(Time) strComputer = "."
> > Set objWMIService = GetObject("winmgmts:" _ & 
> > "{impersonationLevel=impersonate, (Backup, Security)}!\\" & _ 
> > strComputer & "\root\cimv2") Set colLogFiles = 
> objWMIService.ExecQuery 
> > _ ("Select * from Win32_NTEventLogFile where 
> LogFileName='Security'") 
> > For Each objLogfile in colLogFiles 
> > objLogFile.BackupEventLog("c:\seclogs\" & strBackupName & _
> > "_security.evt")
> > objLogFile.ClearEventLog()
> > Next
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, 
> > Joseph
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:10 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [ActiveDir] Logging successful logons in AD security log
> >
> > What is the general consensus on logging successful logon events?
> >
> > For example if you have a domain with 100K users or so and 
> you use AD 
> > as your primary authentication service for: application, 
> file, email, 
> > and web access then it is plausible that you will end up with up to 
> > 100 log entries per second. That kind of volume will no doubt cause 
> > the logs to roll over frequently thus making them somewhat useless.
> >
> > The only alternatives I see are:
> >
> > a) Don't log success logon.
> > b) Set your event log size to a very large (and possibly 
> unmanageable) 
> > size.
> > c) Invest in a fancy log management system that will 
> collect, index, 
> > and retain all of your logs.
> >
> > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> >
> > 
> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to