I'd add to Darren's comments as follows:

1. Ensure that ADM files are not auto over written by GPO editors.
"User config/admin templates/system/group policy/turn off automatic
update of ADM files"

2. Test new ADMs - I have seen adm files which do not support an entry
which was supported by an older ADM. 

neil

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: 06 September 2006 16:07
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] adm file management

Graham-
You are correct on both counts. ADMs are typically supersets of each
other--2003, SP1 is a superset of XP,SP2, XP is a superset of 2000, etc.
And it is definitely best to manage such a mixed environment from the
latest platform (e.g. XP). The key of course, is to pay attention to the
"Supported" tags in the newer ADMs.

Darren

Darren Mar-Elia
For comprehensive Windows Group Policy Information, check out
www.gpoguy.com-- the best source for GPO FAQs, video training, tools and
whitepapers. Also check out the Windows Group Policy Guide, the
definitive resource for Group Policy information.
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graham Turner
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 7:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] adm file management

quick question (hopefully not too daft) ref ADM file management

it seems different OS's ship with different versions of the 'standard'
ADM files that include conf.adm / interes.adm / system.adm ...

say if you are maintaining policies that link to containers holding say
XP , 2000,
2003 computers it would not be unreasonable to manage them all from a
single host on which you edit policies.

am i correct to say that in maintaining the settings in these files are
always cumulative - if that's the right word

if so then it is correct working practice to always use the MOST RECENT
version of an ADM file with no fear of breaking previously functional
GPO's ???

GT





List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx



PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments.  NIplc
does not provide investment services to private customers.  Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority.  Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35.  Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP.  A member of the Nomura group of companies.

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to