They're not talking about home users at all.
The problem with being sensational in your declarations is that, well, you're sensational and people completely take off with the information. I don't see much work being done to correct that thinking, and as I mentioned I believe he's also throwing his hands in the air and saying, "well, we couldn't make things work any better. Passport (and similar) is a failure so let's go back to what works."
I do wholeheartedly agree that risk is something that varies widely and should be a case by case basis. I get that. I'd like to see this done a bit differently I suppose.
Al
On 9/11/06, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
