Thanks for that pointer. I might be making some nominations.....

I have done lots of hacking of registry etc, but at some point you have
to cut your losses. I think when before we started the lock down there
were about 3,500 PC's with local admin rights. We are now down to
between 20 and 30. This is less than 1% of our PCs. Its now a managable
problem and its under control. From being our number one problem its
gone down to being below (well almost below) the radar.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: 15 September 2006 14:53
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware

www.threatcode.com

....and those business critical apps are?

Have you tried hacking up the registry to get them to work?

Dave Wade wrote:
> Chris,
> I guess I have three "comments" on this:-
> 1) Putting user in "Power users" does "cut down on the potential", 
> however even on a properly configured machine users can usually 
> install personal browser extensions containing SpyWare.
> 2) Spy ware hangs around for a long time. Our users used to have admin

> rights so there is a lot of "legacy" spyware around
> 3) We still have business critical applications that won't run without

> admin rights. Often these are tightly integrated in a large suite of 
> applications, e.g. the Call Centre management suit, so we still have 
> some machines where users have admin rights. I know this sucks but 
> there is certainly no cash available to replace these apps....
> Dave.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Chris 
> Pohlschneider
> *Sent:* 14 September 2006 20:15
> *To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
>
> I have not done a lot of research on this, but if you have users in 
> either the power users or regular users group, won't that cut down 
> tremendously on the potential of getting adware/spyware?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Chinnery, 
> Paul
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:04 AM
> *To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
>
> We're using CounterSpy Enterprise from Sunbelt Software. Like you, we 
> have seen aperformance hit* on computers with just 128 meg of memory 
> but that goes away when we add more memory. The only issue I ran into,

> other than performance, was it blocked a cookie that was necessary for

> our payroll department. However, once I "okayed" that cookie, it was 
> fine.
>
> *According to Sunbelt, the next version is supposed to reduce the 
> performance impact.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Chris
>     Pohlschneider
>     *Sent:* Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:44 AM
>     *To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>     *Subject:* [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
>
>     Just curious what other people are using for protecting against
>     adware/spyware? We are using Webroot Spysweeper right now, but I
>     see some performance hits on computers running this software and
>     it does work, but it causes headaches will installing some apps
>     that we approve. Any suggestions are appreciated.
>
>     Chris Pohlschneider
>
>     Holloway Sportswear IT
>
>     937-494-2559
>
>     937-497-7300 (Fax)
>
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they 
> are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to 
> disclose this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of 
> Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one 
> of the exemptions in the Act.
>
> If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport e-Services 
> via [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then permanently remove it from 
> your system.
>
> Thank you.
>
> http://www.stockport.gov.uk
> **********************************************************************
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to