Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] IIFP GAL Sync: X.500 Addresses

[Al Mulnick]

There's an additional reason you would want those addresses: replies to email will work with that address stamped on there.  There was a blog entry last year related to x.500 addresses and their usage on "you had me at ehlo" or something like that. 

I haven't used the IIFP, but I would expect to have one x.500 from each forest for Exchange mail to work properly.

Al

On 9/22/06, Tony Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Two forest scenario.  IIFP 1a. Both forests Windows 2003 SP1 and  Exchange 2003 SP2.

After initial setup and synchronisation I notice that my synced users (and their corresponding Contact objects in the second forest) acquire two new X500 addresses (one for each Exchange org).

Simple question really.  Is this normal and expected or have I misconfigured something?  I assume the X500 address is to uniquely identify them in the metaverse, but having two seems excessive!

Thanks

Tony






________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org




List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx