If I may ask, was the in-house provisioning a home grown application or commerical?
Dan > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LCS permissions > From: "Brandon Bernier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, October 19, 2006 9:45 am > To: <ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> > > The install requires that all the ACL's from the /domainprep are present > for the install to work. But after the fact we removed the LCS ACL's and > let our in-house provisioning system handle it. > > -Brandon > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Daniel Gilbert > Sent: Thu 10/19/2006 12:13 PM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: [ActiveDir] LCS permissions > > > > Before I flood this list with inane LCS questions, I was wondering if > anyone out here has any experience with attempting to use granular > permissioning with LCS? > > I know the application is written to be used domain-wide but due to > business requirements I must attempt to limit use to a single OU. > > I am considering limiting access to the ms-RTC attributes in order to > control access (or management thereof) to LCS. > > Any one tried this before? > > Daniel > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
