Better question ... is there an "accept" switch to use? If you try a tool in a loop against a set of servers, it prompts for every one of them...
:m:dsm:cci:mvp | marcusoh.blogspot.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 4:05 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: "new" ms-Sysinternals utils: .exe size gone up like crazy! We had to compile in bbisw.lib (Big Brother Is Watching). You might think that's against your rights, but you signged them away when you accepted the 5k larger eula.txt below (which you didn't read). Cheers, BrettSh [EMAIL PROTECTED] <-- I've decided its funny when I use it. Just b/c I know this kind of thing can go rabbidly out of control, _YES, I WAS KIDDING._ On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Steve Egan (Temp) wrote: > Back in my days of programming in C, if we used the C-Worthy Interface > Library (CWIL), a simple three-line program would be a MINIMUM of 170K. > Maybe it's because a GUI is now included, or somesuch?? > > Steve Egan > Purcell Systems > System/Network Administrator > desk 509 755-0341 x110 > cell 509 475-7682 > fax 509 755-0345 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:33 AM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: "new" ms-Sysinternals utils: .exe size gone > up like crazy! > > I think MS may have signed them all. Dunno if that increases size. > > Thanks, > Brian Desmond > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > c - 312.731.3132 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Javier Jarava > > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:47 PM > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: "new" ms-Sysinternals utils: .exe size gone > up > > like crazy! > > > > Hi! > > > > Just a quick question to the list, to see what the honrable members > > (tm) > > think. > > > > I have just d/l some of the the updated sysinternals tools from MS > > (filemon, > > regmon, autoruns and pstools to be precise), and I have noticed that > > most if > > not all the utils have grown in size A LOT. > > > > As an example, this is the change I see from pstools v2.34 and v2.4: > > > > Archive: SYSINTERNALS PsTools v2.34 -20060710- PsTools.zip > > Length Date Time Name > > -------- ---- ---- ---- > > 122880 20/03/06 16:19 psshutdown.exe > > 94208 02/08/05 11:14 pskill.exe > > 65536 30/03/06 10:05 psloglist.exe > > 49152 27/03/06 13:07 psloggedon.exe > > 106496 21/07/05 10:22 psgetsid.exe > > 146704 26/07/00 12:00 pdh.dll > > 57344 06/04/06 14:52 psservice.exe > > 53248 30/12/05 03:15 psfile.exe > > 135168 11/07/06 09:00 psexec.exe > > 63786 08/07/06 11:10 Pstools.chm > > 135168 13/12/05 09:51 Psinfo.exe > > 106496 07/11/03 14:42 pssuspend.exe > > 86016 01/12/04 17:27 pslist.exe > > 57344 16/05/04 08:36 pspasswd.exe > > 1969 11/02/06 09:22 Eula.txt > > 39 10/07/06 13:58 version.txt > > -------- ------- > > 1281554 16 files > > > > Archive: SYSINTERNALS PsTools v2.4 -20061101- PsTools.zip > > Length Date Time Name > > -------- ---- ---- ---- > > 412472 01/11/06 13:07 psexec.exe > > 166712 01/11/06 13:06 psfile.exe > > 322360 01/11/06 13:07 psgetsid.exe > > 428856 01/11/06 13:07 Psinfo.exe > > 318264 01/11/06 13:07 pskill.exe > > 191288 01/11/06 13:06 pslist.exe > > 162616 01/11/06 13:06 psloggedon.exe > > 187192 01/11/06 13:06 psloglist.exe > > 170808 01/11/06 13:06 pspasswd.exe > > 179000 01/11/06 13:06 psservice.exe > > 404280 01/11/06 13:07 psshutdown.exe > > 375608 01/11/06 13:07 pssuspend.exe > > 63786 08/07/06 11:10 Pstools.chm > > 38 15/10/06 16:32 psversion.txt > > 153672 01/11/06 13:05 pdh.dll > > 7005 28/07/06 08:32 Eula.txt > > -------- ------- > > 3543957 16 files > > > > Just wondering outloud what is the reason for the size change. > > Different > > compiler, maybe? > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your time in reading thus far. > > > > Javier Jarava > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
