Yes, enable it on the server.  Only records with old timestamps will be
deleted.  So the only real possible negative is you somehow have "valid"
records with old timestamps that have not been refreshing their timestamps
for some reason.  How could that happen?  Perhaps you had devices previously
performing dynamic updates but then someone disabled the feature on them so
now their records have old timestamps.

Don't worry about the "set all zones..." option unless you want to enable
scavenging on all the zones by default.

To your 3rd and 4th questions, yes and yes.

Just make sure you have valid backups and flip the switch.  Just because
it's the day before a major holiday doesn't mean you can't take risks.  :)
You can also use dnscmd.exe /zoneexport to dump the zone(s) if you want a
file backup of it.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon Pegue
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging - new issue

The recent thread on DNS scavenging was interesting and
informative. It has lead me to investigate my own DNS
scavenging issue and I'd appreciate some assistance with
figuring out how to resolve it.

I manage a single domain with a mixture of 2 - Win2K &
3 - Win2K3 servers. My 2 DC's are on Win2K boxes, I have
one Win2K3 server running Exchange 2K3 and the other 2
Win2K3 servers are basically file servers at this point
although we plan on promoting one to a DC in the near
future and retiring one of the Win2K DC's.

My DNS is AD integrated.

My issue involves the issue of old, stale DNS RR's not
being properly scavenged and even though I've read some
of the documents linked in the previous thread, I'm still
a bit uncertain how to rectify my issue without totally
botching things - I'm a bit of a newbie...

Anyhow, I examine the contents of my Reverse Lookup Zone
and I find 2 Name entries for the same machine name. If I
examine the properties of each, I see, for example, that
the Record Time Stamp for one is 6-6-05 and 11-21-06 for
the other. Checking DHCP shows that the IP address for the
11-21-06 entry is the active one.

When I check the Aging settings for the zone, I see that the
No-refresh interval is set to 7 hours, the Refresh interval
is set to 7 days and the Scavenge stale RR check box is checked.

OK so far, me thinks.

When I check the properties for the DNS server, under the
Advanced tab, the Enable automatic scavenging of stale records
check box is _not_ checked.

My first question: Should it be checked?
My second question: Are the any negative consequences to doing so?

Next, when I right-click the DNS server and click Set Aging/
Scavenging for All Zones, I see that the No-refresh interval is
set to 7 days, the Refresh interval is also set to 7 days and
the Scavenge stale RR check box is _not_ checked.

My third question: As opposed to my previous 2 questions, is this
where I should be enabling scavenging?

My final question: Once the scavenging has been properly enabled,
will the really stale RR records be removed?


TIA
Gordon Pegue
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to