I agree with this..our production ESX infrastructure is
based on 3 quad core systems..we haven't even come close to
maxing the CPU's or memory but disk i/o is getting high..

Nathan Casey
Network Analyst
WGS-ISD County of Sonoma
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(707) 565-3519

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/22/2006 10:41:11 AM >>>
A pair of quad cores is a lot of horsepower for testing. I
suspect you
will run out of disk i/o perf and memory long before you
encounter the
need for a second quad core chip given the scenarios you've
described.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

c - 312.731.3132

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 8:55 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2007 and W2K3 R2 DC's on
ESX - Optimal
lab system

I posted this on the VMWARE forum as well but I am very
interested in 
the opinion of the people who post to this list and there
must be some 
people with hands on experience with ESX and DC's and
Exchange 2007 
running on VM's on top of ESX 3.0.1.

I am interested in the following: 

We will be buying a Dell PowerEdge 2900 with either 1 Quad
Core 
processor at 2,33 GHz or 2 Dual Core processors at 2,33
GHz. We will be 
using this machine in a test lab only and will be testing
mainly 
Exchange 2007 and simulating AD issues. We would like to
deploy ESX 
3.0.1 (or the newest versionwith several Exchange 2007 VM's
and several 
W2K3 R2 Domain Controller VM's on it.

We are doubting between the following configurations, both
DELL 2900's. 
We will unfortunately only be buying one system so we
definately need 
to make the right choice. 

As I said we want to buy a system with either 2 Dual Cores
or 1 Quad 
Core, see here under: 

- 1 Quad Core 2.33 GHz Processor, Xeon 5345 
- 2 Dual Core 2.33 GHz Processors, Xeon 5140 

Both systems will have 8 GB of 667 MHz RAM to start with. 

We have contacted Dell and we were told that the 5345 Xeon
will be 
available in January at the latest. 

We dont really care about the price at this moment.

The first thing that comes to mind when making a choice, to
me is the 
fact that if one Quad would not be enough, we could always
plug in 
another one :-) at a later time. 

Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx 
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx 
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx 
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx 
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to