svn commit: r417455 - /incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-mantaray.html

[jstrachan]

Author: jstrachan
Date: Tue Jun 27 06:44:35 2006
New Revision: 417455

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=417455&view=rev
Log:
Latest export from confluence

Modified:
    incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-mantaray.html

Modified: incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-mantaray.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-mantaray.html?rev=417455&r1=417454&r2=417455&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-mantaray.html 
(original)
+++ incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-mantaray.html Tue Jun 
27 06:44:35 2006
@@ -245,9 +245,9 @@
 <!--          
             <div class="pagetitle">How does ActiveMQ compare to Mantaray</div>
 -->
-            <DIV class="wiki-content"><P>We are hopelessly biassed - just use 
ActiveMQ! <IMG class="emoticon" 
src="http://goopen.org/confluence/images/icons/emoticons/smile.gif"; height="20" 
width="20" align="absmiddle" alt="" border="0"> - but Mantaray is an OK JMS 
provider. The interesting thing about MantaRay is it supports a peer based 
network such as ActiveMQ does with its <A href="peer-transport-reference.html" 
title="Peer Transport Reference">peer transport</A></P>
+            <DIV class="wiki-content"><P>We are obviously biased, and will 
tell you &quot;just use ActiveMQ!&quot; <IMG class="emoticon" 
src="http://goopen.org/confluence/images/icons/emoticons/smile.gif"; height="20" 
width="20" align="absmiddle" alt="" border="0">  But Mantaray is an OK JMS 
provider. The interesting thing about MantaRay is it can support a peer-based 
network, just as ActiveMQ does with its <A href="peer-transport-reference.html" 
title="Peer Transport Reference">peer transport</A>.</P>
 
-<P>We <A href="performance.html" title="Performance">benchmark</A> against 
Mantaray and other open source JMS providers and we usually beat it <IMG 
class="emoticon" 
src="http://goopen.org/confluence/images/icons/emoticons/smile.gif"; height="20" 
width="20" align="absmiddle" alt="" border="0">.</P>
+<P>We <A href="performance.html" title="Performance">benchmark</A> against 
Mantaray and other open source JMS providers and in our tests (in which we try 
to be as objective as possible) ActiveMQ exhibits higher performance in most 
scenarios.</P>
 
 <P>A peer transport can be useful when using non-persistent messaging. But if 
you want persistent messaging you often want to use a federated network with 
certain brokers on the network being the persistence brokers (so you can backup 
the file systems etc).</P>
 
@@ -261,8 +261,9 @@
     </DIV>
     <DIV id="site-footer">
           Added by     <A 
href="http://goopen.org/confluence/users/viewuserprofile.action?username=jstrachan";>James
 Strachan</A>,
-    last edited by     <A 
href="http://goopen.org/confluence/users/viewuserprofile.action?username=jstrachan";>James
 Strachan</A> on Jun 27, 2006
-                  
+    last edited by     <A 
href="http://goopen.org/confluence/users/viewuserprofile.action?username=rpetersen";>Rich
 Petersen</A> on Jun 27, 2006
+                  &nbsp;(<A 
href="http://goopen.org/confluence/pages/diffpages.action?pageId=8885&originalId=8888";>view
 change</A>)
+              
       (<A 
href="http://goopen.org/confluence/pages/editpage.action?pageId=8885";>edit 
page</A>)
     </DIV>